01.01.2015 Views

June 15, 2009 - District of Mission

June 15, 2009 - District of Mission

June 15, 2009 - District of Mission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

41<br />

Neighbourhood Context<br />

The proposal is in an area where the neighbourhood character is in transition due to<br />

development as proposed in the Cedar Valley Comprehensive Development Plan.<br />

Properties on the south side <strong>of</strong> Cherry Avenue, east <strong>of</strong> Cedar Street have been developed into<br />

single-family lots. Properties on the north side <strong>of</strong> Cherry Avenue are currently single-family<br />

however designated for mufti-family development in the Cedar Valley Comprehensive<br />

Development Plan.<br />

Development Variance Permit DV08-008<br />

As part <strong>of</strong> the construction <strong>of</strong> the infrastructure, two issues surfaced affecting the layout <strong>of</strong> the<br />

subdivision:<br />

1. The lane at the rear <strong>of</strong> each proposed property shifted north; and<br />

2. The right <strong>of</strong> way for storm water was increased affecting the amount <strong>of</strong> back yard space.<br />

Due the above constraints, the applicant initially proposed two separate variances for rear yard<br />

setbacks on two lots, Lots 1 and 2, because the garages could no longer be detached; the<br />

detached garages could not be built on a required right <strong>of</strong> way.<br />

The result <strong>of</strong> attaching the garages to the dwelling and reducing the rear yard setback would<br />

have meant no useable yards for use by the residents. Therefore, staff recommended that the<br />

developer apply for front yard setbacks, instead <strong>of</strong> rear yard setback variances, on all the lots<br />

fronting Cherry to facilitate larger, more usable rear yards.<br />

On Lot 6, although a detached garage can be accomplished similar to Lots 3, 4, and 5, the<br />

applicant has provided an attractive alternative showing the attached garage maintaining a<br />

significant useable, private rear yard.<br />

By reducing the front yard setback coupled with front porches as part <strong>of</strong> the design <strong>of</strong> the<br />

homes, a greater street presence along Cherry Avenue can be achieved.<br />

Attached are the site plans <strong>of</strong> Lots 1 through 6 showing the building envelopes and associated<br />

proposed setback variances. (Appendix B)<br />

Summary<br />

Staff recommends that Development Variance application DVO8-008 be forwarded to public<br />

input meeting and consideration <strong>of</strong> approval on August 25, 2008.<br />

Marcy Bond<br />

SZ(14/0t4lARMAPPLICATIONSIRUOKING■2226AppkabonalSuis 06-027 R06-030191/064114 kilaPrierson (Chan IV DV tor Lad 2 & e lot maPhelsonAkt<br />

FILEPRO.DEV.DEV PAGE 2 OF 4<br />

0/08-008

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!