18.01.2015 Views

60199616-flight-to-freedom-african-runaways-and-maroons-in-the-americas

60199616-flight-to-freedom-african-runaways-and-maroons-in-the-americas

60199616-flight-to-freedom-african-runaways-and-maroons-in-the-americas

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 9<br />

Negotiations <strong>and</strong> Treaties<br />

Collaboration between Enslaver<br />

<strong>and</strong> Enslaved<br />

We have noted already that marronage was both ideologically <strong>and</strong> practically<br />

opposed <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> slavery system. It would seem, <strong>the</strong>refore, that <strong>the</strong>re could be<br />

no middle ground between <strong>the</strong> two systems, <strong>and</strong> that <strong>the</strong>ir relations with<br />

each o<strong>the</strong>r would always be antagonistic. In practice, however, Maroons <strong>and</strong><br />

slaveholders often found a middle ground that, if not entirely satisfac<strong>to</strong>ry <strong>to</strong><br />

ei<strong>the</strong>r party, tended <strong>to</strong> resolve future conflicts through negotiation, arbitration<br />

<strong>and</strong> compromise ra<strong>the</strong>r than by force. From <strong>the</strong> earliest days of Maroon<br />

activities, negotiations <strong>to</strong>ok place <strong>to</strong> elim<strong>in</strong>ate or conta<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Maroons. For<br />

convenience, we shall divide <strong>the</strong> negotiations <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> two broad categories: those<br />

that did not <strong>in</strong>volve Maroons directly but sought <strong>to</strong> subvert Maroon polities,<br />

<strong>and</strong> those between Maroons <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> slavehold<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terests. The first category<br />

<strong>in</strong>volved <strong>the</strong> enslavers’ negotiations variously with enslaved persons, free<br />

Blacks, free Coloureds <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> governments of foreign countries. The second<br />

category concerned negotiations with <strong>in</strong>dividual Maroons, specific people<br />

with<strong>in</strong> a given Maroon settlement <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Maroon community as a whole.<br />

With<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> context of slavery, <strong>and</strong> often outside <strong>the</strong> discourse on marronage,<br />

<strong>the</strong>re were always ongo<strong>in</strong>g “negotiations” between <strong>the</strong> slavehold<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>terests <strong>and</strong> enslaved persons who displayed various <strong>to</strong>lerance levels <strong>to</strong><br />

enslavement. They ranged from those who were prepared <strong>to</strong> accept <strong>freedom</strong><br />

if it was offered <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>m but showed no particular urgency <strong>to</strong> agitate for it, <strong>to</strong><br />

o<strong>the</strong>rs who were disposed <strong>to</strong> pursue it actively through good works <strong>and</strong><br />

265

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!