18.01.2015 Views

60199616-flight-to-freedom-african-runaways-and-maroons-in-the-americas

60199616-flight-to-freedom-african-runaways-and-maroons-in-the-americas

60199616-flight-to-freedom-african-runaways-and-maroons-in-the-americas

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Negotiations <strong>and</strong> Treaties<br />

289<br />

said that some colonists <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> neighbourhood of Palmares paid tribute <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Maroons <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> form of <strong>to</strong>ols, powder, lead, arms <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r articles that <strong>the</strong>y<br />

requested, <strong>in</strong> exchange for be<strong>in</strong>g allowed <strong>to</strong> cultivate <strong>the</strong>ir plots peacefully.<br />

Among those <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> this arrangement was Cris<strong>to</strong>bal de Burgos, an<br />

appellate judge (Carneiro 1946, 56–58; Flory 1979, 126). There is likewise a letter<br />

by members of <strong>the</strong> provisional government of Bahia <strong>in</strong> 1763, report<strong>in</strong>g on<br />

<strong>the</strong> destruction of <strong>the</strong> Buraco do Tatú mocambo by an expeditionary force,<br />

which states that planters were forced <strong>to</strong> accommodate <strong>the</strong> Maroons because<br />

<strong>the</strong>y were afraid that <strong>the</strong>y would be assass<strong>in</strong>ated or <strong>the</strong>ir crops destroyed<br />

(Conrad 1983, 380). The letter details <strong>the</strong> many k<strong>in</strong>ds of assaults that <strong>the</strong><br />

Maroons had been accus<strong>to</strong>med <strong>to</strong> carry out aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong> planters <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

people. 23 These examples emphasize <strong>the</strong> degree of fear, frustration <strong>and</strong> feebleness<br />

that some planters felt <strong>in</strong> face of Maroon depredations. They also<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicate <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>ability of <strong>the</strong> authoritarian state <strong>to</strong> ensure <strong>the</strong> safety of <strong>the</strong><br />

colonists – or, at least, <strong>the</strong> planters’ lack of faith <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> state’s ability <strong>to</strong> do so.<br />

Maroon Treaties<br />

By far <strong>the</strong> most significant negotiations between <strong>the</strong> Maroons <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> slavehold<strong>in</strong>g<br />

fraternity related <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> recognition of Maroon communities as <strong>in</strong>dependent<br />

or au<strong>to</strong>nomous polities, <strong>and</strong> often <strong>the</strong> confirmation of Maroon<br />

occupation rights <strong>to</strong> certa<strong>in</strong> l<strong>and</strong>s. Some negotiations also referred <strong>to</strong> Maroon<br />

assistance <strong>in</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> security of <strong>the</strong> authoritarian state aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>in</strong>ternal<br />

<strong>and</strong>/or external aggression. Mexico, Panama, Colombia, Brazil, Jamaica,<br />

Sur<strong>in</strong>ame, Essequibo, <strong>the</strong> Dom<strong>in</strong>ican Republic, Dom<strong>in</strong>ica, French Guiana<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> United States all signed treaties that <strong>in</strong>cluded such terms. In this<br />

section we shall deal with specific aspects of a few of <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> treaties, <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> next chapter undertake a general analysis of treaties.<br />

Treaties between Maroons <strong>and</strong> slavehold<strong>in</strong>g states were forged as early as<br />

<strong>the</strong> mid-sixteenth century, if not before, with Maroon groups <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Dom<strong>in</strong>ican Republic <strong>and</strong> Darien (<strong>in</strong> Panama). The two treaties made <strong>in</strong> 1580<br />

with <strong>the</strong> Darien Maroons, though not as wide-rang<strong>in</strong>g as <strong>the</strong> later Mexican<br />

treaty with Yanga, recognized <strong>the</strong> <strong>freedom</strong> of Puer<strong>to</strong> Bello <strong>and</strong> Ballano, two<br />

palenques near Nombre de Dios (La Guardia 1977, 94–97; Campbell 1990, 8).<br />

These treaties conta<strong>in</strong>ed several of <strong>the</strong> clauses found <strong>in</strong> later treaties.<br />

However, <strong>the</strong> Darien treaties also conta<strong>in</strong>ed an important clause not common<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> later treaties that <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r colonial powers signed: <strong>the</strong> right of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!