18.01.2015 Views

60199616-flight-to-freedom-african-runaways-and-maroons-in-the-americas

60199616-flight-to-freedom-african-runaways-and-maroons-in-the-americas

60199616-flight-to-freedom-african-runaways-and-maroons-in-the-americas

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Forms of Marronage<br />

85<br />

refer <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> large groups as “tribes”, suggest<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>the</strong>y had acquired <strong>the</strong><br />

profile of dist<strong>in</strong>ct ethnic groups. The large <strong>and</strong> powerful entities sometimes<br />

vied with each o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> slavehold<strong>in</strong>g states for physical space <strong>and</strong> material<br />

resources, <strong>and</strong> occasionally fought <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> death <strong>to</strong> elim<strong>in</strong>ate each o<strong>the</strong>r.<br />

One of <strong>the</strong> most no<strong>to</strong>rious examples was <strong>the</strong> part that <strong>the</strong> Ndjuka (Auka)<br />

Maroons played <strong>in</strong> destroy<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Aluku (Boni) Maroon settlements <strong>in</strong><br />

Sur<strong>in</strong>ame <strong>in</strong> 1793 (Hoogbergen 1990). By that time <strong>the</strong> Ndjukas had undergone<br />

over thirty years of “pacification” follow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir treaty with <strong>the</strong> colonial<br />

authorities <strong>in</strong> 1760, <strong>and</strong> were be<strong>in</strong>g used, not for <strong>the</strong> first time, by <strong>the</strong> Whites<br />

<strong>to</strong> elim<strong>in</strong>ate <strong>the</strong> much more militant Alukus, who were a thorn <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> side of<br />

<strong>the</strong> plan<strong>to</strong>cracy. But <strong>the</strong> Ndjukas had <strong>the</strong>ir own grievances with <strong>the</strong> Alukus,<br />

who apparently posed a threat <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir spatial <strong>in</strong>tegrity. For <strong>the</strong> same reason<br />

<strong>the</strong> Ndjukas attacked a number of groups that had begun <strong>to</strong> establish <strong>the</strong>mselves<br />

along <strong>the</strong> Cottica River <strong>and</strong> Sara <strong>and</strong> Surnau creeks <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> post-treaty<br />

era (Thoden van Velzen 1995, 128–29).<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r groups had various conflicts. In <strong>the</strong> unsettled circumstances of <strong>the</strong><br />

late seventeenth century, several groups that had fled dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> British <strong>in</strong>vasion<br />

of Jamaica distrusted each o<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>and</strong> this distrust persisted for many<br />

years after <strong>the</strong> British had firmly established <strong>the</strong>mselves as <strong>the</strong> new colonial<br />

authority. Patterson (1979, 258) views this circumstance as partly account<strong>in</strong>g<br />

for <strong>the</strong> return of several <strong>runaways</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir overlords. However, by <strong>the</strong> early<br />

eighteenth century many groups were forg<strong>in</strong>g alliances with each o<strong>the</strong>r, based<br />

both on <strong>the</strong>ir material needs <strong>and</strong> on acceptance of <strong>the</strong> stubborn reality that it<br />

was only through such alliances (<strong>and</strong> sometimes even political <strong>in</strong>tegration)<br />

that <strong>the</strong>y would be able <strong>to</strong> resist <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly large military forces be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

sent aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong>m. Still, tensions <strong>and</strong> sometimes clashes occurred between<br />

different groups, <strong>the</strong> result of terri<strong>to</strong>rial notions <strong>and</strong> of treaty arrangements<br />

with <strong>the</strong> authoritarian state.<br />

Suspicion of treachery between Maroon groups was not without some<br />

foundation. This was <strong>the</strong> cause of <strong>the</strong> clash between <strong>the</strong> Juan de Bolas<br />

Maroons, who had accepted a treaty with <strong>the</strong> British that required <strong>the</strong>m<br />

<strong>to</strong> apprehend <strong>runaways</strong>, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Karmahaly (Carmahaly, Vermejales,<br />

Vermaholis, Vermahalles) Maroons under Juan de Serras, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> late seventeenth<br />

century. The same reason prevailed when <strong>the</strong> W<strong>in</strong>dward Maroons<br />

assaulted <strong>the</strong> small group, led by Three-F<strong>in</strong>gered Jack, that was troubl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

Jamaican planters. The Leeward Maroons also considerably harassed a small<br />

group under Capta<strong>in</strong> Gummor (Goomer) <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1730s, apparently because

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!