60199616-flight-to-freedom-african-runaways-and-maroons-in-the-americas
60199616-flight-to-freedom-african-runaways-and-maroons-in-the-americas
60199616-flight-to-freedom-african-runaways-and-maroons-in-the-americas
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Forms of Marronage<br />
85<br />
refer <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> large groups as “tribes”, suggest<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>the</strong>y had acquired <strong>the</strong><br />
profile of dist<strong>in</strong>ct ethnic groups. The large <strong>and</strong> powerful entities sometimes<br />
vied with each o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> slavehold<strong>in</strong>g states for physical space <strong>and</strong> material<br />
resources, <strong>and</strong> occasionally fought <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> death <strong>to</strong> elim<strong>in</strong>ate each o<strong>the</strong>r.<br />
One of <strong>the</strong> most no<strong>to</strong>rious examples was <strong>the</strong> part that <strong>the</strong> Ndjuka (Auka)<br />
Maroons played <strong>in</strong> destroy<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Aluku (Boni) Maroon settlements <strong>in</strong><br />
Sur<strong>in</strong>ame <strong>in</strong> 1793 (Hoogbergen 1990). By that time <strong>the</strong> Ndjukas had undergone<br />
over thirty years of “pacification” follow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir treaty with <strong>the</strong> colonial<br />
authorities <strong>in</strong> 1760, <strong>and</strong> were be<strong>in</strong>g used, not for <strong>the</strong> first time, by <strong>the</strong> Whites<br />
<strong>to</strong> elim<strong>in</strong>ate <strong>the</strong> much more militant Alukus, who were a thorn <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> side of<br />
<strong>the</strong> plan<strong>to</strong>cracy. But <strong>the</strong> Ndjukas had <strong>the</strong>ir own grievances with <strong>the</strong> Alukus,<br />
who apparently posed a threat <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir spatial <strong>in</strong>tegrity. For <strong>the</strong> same reason<br />
<strong>the</strong> Ndjukas attacked a number of groups that had begun <strong>to</strong> establish <strong>the</strong>mselves<br />
along <strong>the</strong> Cottica River <strong>and</strong> Sara <strong>and</strong> Surnau creeks <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> post-treaty<br />
era (Thoden van Velzen 1995, 128–29).<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r groups had various conflicts. In <strong>the</strong> unsettled circumstances of <strong>the</strong><br />
late seventeenth century, several groups that had fled dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> British <strong>in</strong>vasion<br />
of Jamaica distrusted each o<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>and</strong> this distrust persisted for many<br />
years after <strong>the</strong> British had firmly established <strong>the</strong>mselves as <strong>the</strong> new colonial<br />
authority. Patterson (1979, 258) views this circumstance as partly account<strong>in</strong>g<br />
for <strong>the</strong> return of several <strong>runaways</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir overlords. However, by <strong>the</strong> early<br />
eighteenth century many groups were forg<strong>in</strong>g alliances with each o<strong>the</strong>r, based<br />
both on <strong>the</strong>ir material needs <strong>and</strong> on acceptance of <strong>the</strong> stubborn reality that it<br />
was only through such alliances (<strong>and</strong> sometimes even political <strong>in</strong>tegration)<br />
that <strong>the</strong>y would be able <strong>to</strong> resist <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly large military forces be<strong>in</strong>g<br />
sent aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong>m. Still, tensions <strong>and</strong> sometimes clashes occurred between<br />
different groups, <strong>the</strong> result of terri<strong>to</strong>rial notions <strong>and</strong> of treaty arrangements<br />
with <strong>the</strong> authoritarian state.<br />
Suspicion of treachery between Maroon groups was not without some<br />
foundation. This was <strong>the</strong> cause of <strong>the</strong> clash between <strong>the</strong> Juan de Bolas<br />
Maroons, who had accepted a treaty with <strong>the</strong> British that required <strong>the</strong>m<br />
<strong>to</strong> apprehend <strong>runaways</strong>, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Karmahaly (Carmahaly, Vermejales,<br />
Vermaholis, Vermahalles) Maroons under Juan de Serras, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> late seventeenth<br />
century. The same reason prevailed when <strong>the</strong> W<strong>in</strong>dward Maroons<br />
assaulted <strong>the</strong> small group, led by Three-F<strong>in</strong>gered Jack, that was troubl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />
Jamaican planters. The Leeward Maroons also considerably harassed a small<br />
group under Capta<strong>in</strong> Gummor (Goomer) <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1730s, apparently because