14.11.2012 Views

Poker Math That Matters

Poker Math That Matters

Poker Math That Matters

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5. Hero: A♦J♦<br />

Villain has $60 left:<br />

Call up to $20 – A9, AT, AK, AQ, J9, JT, QJ<br />

Shove $60 as bluff after your $20 bet (you’ll<br />

call) – 78<br />

Call all-in for $60 – AK, J9, JT, QJ<br />

Board: 6♣5♦J♥A♥J♠<br />

Which bet is more profitable?<br />

195<br />

Answer: The scenario is the same as question four;<br />

however, there’s a little twist. The smaller bet will<br />

induce a bluff shove from your opponent’s missed<br />

OESD. This adds a tremendous amount of value to your<br />

smaller bet. Nothing in his range will fold; however, 16<br />

of the 60 combinations will give you $60. This is our<br />

EV for the $20 bet.<br />

0.73($20) + 0.27($60) = EV<br />

$14.6 + $16.2 = $30.80<br />

Now, let’s examine the EV of the $60 bet.<br />

0.33($60) = $19.80<br />

Obviously the EV of the $20 bet is better and highlights<br />

the power of inducing bluffs. The astute student may<br />

have noticed the EV of the $60 bet is less now than it<br />

was in question four even though the bet size and<br />

number of combinations calling are both the same. If<br />

you're curious, see Appendix A.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!