Download PDF - The Judiciary
Download PDF - The Judiciary
Download PDF - The Judiciary
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
State of <strong>Judiciary</strong> 2011-2012<br />
53<br />
<strong>The</strong> appointment processes in 2011/12 improved the <strong>Judiciary</strong>’s<br />
staffing proportions – which are already constitutionally compliant<br />
– between genders as illustrated in Figure 5.2.<br />
Figure 5.2: <strong>The</strong> <strong>Judiciary</strong> - Analysis of Start-Year and End-Year Staffing,<br />
plus In-Year Appointments, by Gender<br />
46%<br />
Female<br />
57%<br />
45%<br />
End of Year Staffing<br />
Appointments during the year<br />
54%<br />
Start of Year Staffing<br />
Male<br />
43%<br />
55%<br />
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%<br />
<strong>The</strong> overall year-end gender proportion of 54:46 across the entire<br />
<strong>Judiciary</strong> is broadly mirrored by that for judicial staff, although a<br />
wider gap still exists with regard to judicial officers, as Figure 5.3<br />
illustrates.<br />
70%<br />
Figure 5.3: End-Year Distribution of Judicial Officers and Staff, by Gender<br />
60%<br />
58%<br />
53% 54%<br />
50%<br />
40%<br />
30%<br />
42%<br />
47% 46%<br />
Male<br />
Female<br />
20%<br />
10%<br />
0%<br />
Judicial Officers Judicial Staff TOTAL JUDICIARY<br />
Figure 5.3: Distribution of judicial staff by gender<br />
5.3.8 Human Resource Management and Development -<br />
Promotions
Change language