23.02.2015 Views

Download PDF - The Judiciary

Download PDF - The Judiciary

Download PDF - The Judiciary

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

State of <strong>Judiciary</strong> 2011-2012<br />

87<br />

KENYA HUMAN<br />

RIGHTS<br />

COMMISSION<br />

Established a system for collating public<br />

information and testimony for transmission to<br />

the Judges and Magistrates Vetting Board<br />

Established the Elections Processes and<br />

Monitoring Centre (EPMC), with standing<br />

elections monitors around the country.<br />

Launched the KHRC publication, “Lest<br />

We Forget: <strong>The</strong> Faces of Impunity in<br />

Kenya”, documenting past cases of official<br />

malpractice and recommended sanctions,<br />

as reported in key tribunals, Parliamentary<br />

Committees and commissions of enquiry.<br />

Conducted fact-finding missions to Tana<br />

River to inform interventions towards<br />

restoring lasting peace and calm in Tana<br />

River and beyond<br />

Trained Human Rights networks on the<br />

provisions of the Constitution relating to<br />

Justice Sector Reforms to inform their<br />

participation in CUCs across the country.<br />

Negative impact of silo mentality<br />

and practices hindering the flow<br />

of information<br />

<strong>The</strong> absence of a common<br />

NCAJ work-plan has resulted<br />

in a haphazard approach to<br />

addressing issues in the Justice<br />

Sector.<br />

<strong>The</strong> phased approach to<br />

Justice Sector reforms, with<br />

judicial reforms preceding<br />

comprehensive reforms in<br />

other compatriot agencies<br />

(most notably, reform of the<br />

Kenya Police Service) has had<br />

a disruptive, effect on ongoing<br />

sector-wide reforms.<br />

<strong>The</strong> tendency by government to<br />

present many Bills simultaneously<br />

- often, under intense pressure<br />

of beating constitutionally<br />

prescribed legislation deadlines<br />

- has hampered the adequate<br />

scrutiny by stakeholders. This<br />

has led to poorly drafted laws,<br />

fatally flawed or inoperable<br />

provisions. <strong>The</strong> Power of Mercy<br />

Act (Act Number 21 of 2011),<br />

which was never subjected to<br />

comprehensive stakeholder<br />

participation, is among laws<br />

that cannot serve their intended<br />

purpose.<br />

Lack of a harmonised<br />

interpretation of the Bill of Rights.<br />

Areas of concern are: Rules<br />

of bail and bond; Sentencing,<br />

more so where there is a<br />

statutory imposition of the death<br />

penalty; the interpretation of<br />

life imprisonment and the legal<br />

prescriptions for alternatives to<br />

incarceration.<br />

Establish robust information sharing for<br />

the justice sector<br />

Conduct a comprehensive audit of the<br />

correctional, penal and holding facilities<br />

for purposes of de-contaminating<br />

different cadres of offenders<br />

Build a joint Justice Sector Strategy on<br />

the 2013 Elections<br />

Amend the unworkable provisions of<br />

the Power of Mercy Act to enable the<br />

Power of Mercy Committee execute its<br />

mandate of recommending presidential<br />

pardons, hence, decongesting prisons.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Attorney General and agencies<br />

(CIC and line ministries) to ensure Bills<br />

are processed in a timely fashion;<br />

stakeholders are adequately involved in<br />

debate.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Justice Sector should apply<br />

the experience from the Judicial<br />

Transformation programme as an<br />

illustrative template for rolling out reforms<br />

in the other sector agencies, including<br />

the legal profession. Transitional justice<br />

principles, namely, vetting and lustration,<br />

as well as new doctrines, including,<br />

public participation, should be<br />

advanced across the board as a means<br />

towards transforming the sector.<br />

<strong>The</strong> NCAJ should lead the process of<br />

establishing guidelines and rules on<br />

various aspects of administration of<br />

justice, including bail, sentencing and<br />

alternative dispute resolution.<br />

NATIONAL<br />

COUNCIL FOR<br />

LAW REPORTING<br />

Facilitated the development of a robust,<br />

indigenous, progressive and patriotic<br />

jurisprudence<br />

Enhanced the financial, infrastructural and<br />

human resources of the Council<br />

Compiled a specialised set of legal<br />

reference materials on the law and<br />

jurisprudence of elections as well<br />

as emerging jurisprudence on the<br />

interpretation of the constitution particularly<br />

on the Bill of Rights, leadership and integrity<br />

Lack of adequate resources to<br />

effectively fulfil NCLR’s mandate<br />

Legal risks and liabilities<br />

associated with publishing and<br />

dissemination of information<br />

Dynamic changes in technology<br />

for which NCLR has limited<br />

resources to pace<br />

Increase financial, human and<br />

infrastructural resources allocation<br />

to the Council to enable it meet the<br />

demands of the transformed <strong>Judiciary</strong><br />

and the expectations of Kenyans under<br />

the new Constitution<br />

Democratise access to public legal<br />

information through the use of national<br />

language<br />

Leverage on partnerships with the<br />

<strong>Judiciary</strong> Training Institute, Kenya<br />

School of Law and other stakeholders<br />

in improving the quality and quantity of<br />

legal resource materials

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!