Technical Report - International Military Testing Association

.L
.: -_ _.
.\
.‘? .’
’ I -. ,
I .:
. . . i+’
,*!
i _:
procedure doeo, in fact, exist. This information wlll be valuable in
facilitating in the quest for the most satisfnctcry criterion aaasureuent
procedure to be used in valldatloa studies.
The four rating procedures to be used a.6 criterion masure of
performsnce efficiency are self ratings, peer or co-worker ratings,
supervisory ratings (first and second level), and group-speciallet
ratings. Theoe avaluatto~ will al1 be obtatned on fder.tlcal rating
forms comprised of an appraisal of the subordimte’a “(Xterell perform
ance” and a check list of his overall job-proficiency quallflcatfon_s.
-_
These data when collected, vi11 be analyzed in vhole as vell as by
subparts to derive the most meaningful information from them.
These have been just some of the more pertinent research projects
conducted at EEC. Uany other research projects have been done in the
p-t, and many more are now in the developnrent ataga. It is believed
that only through dellgent und carefully designed research programs
such as these will improvement in our evaluation syntem be realized.
120
,