Technical Report - International Military Testing Association

More documents

Recommendations

Info

: . A . . . 3. Officarr’ Administrmtivs Subjects ExamlnatFon (QASI?~ The purpose is tolwtivaCe avery company grade officer to faxitfarirrtlm with a varfrty of edxafnirtrativo typo eubfectt. Every officw muat t&a thm aroadnctfon, re a Lieutenant and again ae (II Captain. Soccurful cafspleticm of ME is not adatory for promotion but arch officrr baa to continue to take the cxmdnatla tech peer until ha ruccesrfi~lly parrrr it. The test itsar are eelected by CL board of fiald grade officero and acre&led into a te8t at WI. 3-m temt8 are grsded by m and 8 r8port 18 8ubmitted to\XArine Carp He8dqUarter8 which in turn publirhrr the rerults and direct8 an rpproprints entry in th8 OffiC8r'8 jACk8t. lor thir 8~mtp08i.um, tvo pertinent conclu8ioa8 cw b8 mad8 -- 1. Althargh th8re are rlgalficant difference8 in th888 progr8m8, th8r8 oboiour~y 16 con8td8rable CanauMlfty fa the U8es of th8 tcrto. 2. Purth8nmre, th8 baelc goal of th8 programs of all tbs rervfcco c8n b8 srpt8408d, in a gtnrr81 v8y, ~8 being ured t0 provld8 mU8ure8 Of thr extent to uhich wincer have nmtsrad the rignific8nt aEpact8 of thrir milltorp 8peCi&lty. ! : 39
I .a , I ’ ! ; * . . . . . . , Am!t- NAYY AIR FOt Cl! COAST GJAxD zi TEST 1 Mm!& ‘IEST . . * . AWARD PRO-PAY WOS YERIP ICATIOW FFuxYrIm QuALxFICATmN !SJBJECT-tL4TTKR SPZCIALISTS EVALWTICH SCORE SC~RR AT SERVW? SCHoOts AND PAY GRADE 6 tfOS Dl!mmma’L?rn IDEHTXFY TRAIMING NEEDS CYI’fiER AREt INSTALUTICNS PEW-E FACTOR SUBJECT-IUTI’RR SPECIALISTS x.mcTx OF SERYICL PRm(xp Assn?zED To FUVAL TIXKINRATE NUMKR OF AWARDSIIt EXAtUMI!G CFXTER TRST UI’RER FAcfCRS TZST PERF-CE PACKtR mm OF SKRYfcE -liiEZYXEARD,J SUBJECT-HATTKR SPECIALISTS AWARD OF M sPEcIALxlp TDY TO 6570th WRSmL RKSEARca IABCRATORY PRmoN SzmcT-#hTrRR SPECIALX~S PIMXWTIOR @MST) TEST IDEmIEY TRAINING NEEDS (CXSPE’T) SuBrn-PATrKR sPEcr.hLxsTs CYl’ER FACTORS nvsPEcTxoN (ET) tiOTIVATIfXl (OASR) . . . c .\ -_-_-- , . . * I . . I
Page 1: UNCLASSIFIED/UNLIMITED Technical Re
Page 4 and 5: . r � � . . rnl.ITAkf ies?ING A
Page 6 and 7: :a-- � . . __ ._ _ .._ _ .___. -
Page 8 and 9: . . . _ _- -_ _.. ..--._... -.. .-.
Page 10 and 11: .-. c 1. - - . . __. . _ _ _ _ . --
Page 12 and 13: (i . * -. -._ _ . . . . have one @k
Page 14 and 15: .-- A- . __ .-._ -.-.. - -‘--- .-
Page 16 and 17: : i f I . . _.. _ ._ ” .-. -. ._
Page 18 and 19: -. / ,’ i _. . . _. __ _. __. .._
Page 20 and 21: . __ . ____ . . .- ---__.._ - __.__
Page 22 and 23: ., � � . 3 . i’ i i I , ‘ .
Page 24 and 25: F ‘. r2r . * . . � , , ! ,. .
Page 26 and 27: - ; , . -_ . . . . .’ , i: ‘. :
Page 28 and 29: ‘. . The initial objective of th
Page 30 and 31: \I’ . . i ’ ’ _ . . I 1 Z-N -
Page 32 and 33: . , . . Perspective DR. HAROLD A. E
Page 34 and 35: . . . . . . need another sort of te
Page 36 and 37: .___ ---.-.-a ---._- ~.-~“..CI.~.
Page 38 and 39: . . - . -. . . ‘. - -m.__ ’ We
Page 40 and 41: w - ------- --- -.-. ___..- - I _ .
Page 42 and 43: . . . , - . . - . 2 . . . .--...-.
Page 44 and 45: c. / I ’ . a . c . ’ , Summary
Page 46 and 47: -- /-’ 1. Bxamfnatfoti Grade 2. P
Page 50 and 51: . . . Conctpta for Exploration in P
Page 52 and 53: Here; UC are trying to make acveral
Page 54 and 55: ‘a : . -.. . . 1 . . . . . _. . .
Page 56 and 57: f -. ‘Ibotertfaoul,X:-Cp I .- . .
Page 58 and 59: -.. :.. . , / _ :. . .A. . . - ---.
Page 60 and 61: Teat reliability? -- Certainly 6OmC
Page 62 and 63: . . One of the p~oblmnr that we pro
Page 64 and 65: . . . The Prsdictioa of fob Profici
Page 66 and 67: . The basic fomula uhic:!~ generate
Page 68 and 69: . - - . . . . * . i ’ f “. . z
Page 70 and 71: -- 1 . * __-_..___ __.-_.- I . �
Page 72 and 73: . . .* . - ..-.. ___ - --- -___ -._
Page 74 and 75: _ . . . _ .- ._ ..-.-_ _---.---- -
Page 76 and 77: __ ._ __ ._ .^ . .._--- -. ____. ..
Page 78 and 79: � Teble 8 Thr Probubilitier of Gr
Page 80 and 81: 60 40 30 20 10 1. Identify PtlAEr 1
Page 82 and 83: . . . . Parronality Tooting md Job
Page 84 and 85: -. _- _. ._. ,. _ -- _ ______-_____
Page 86 and 87: . . . . ,’ . . NW we rhould recog
Page 88 and 89: _ . - . .._ - -_-..-.-- _-_- ._,__X
Page 90 and 91: . -. . . . -- .--- ..-_ .--- . .--.
Page 92 and 93: . . . In their reply the US Army Pe
Page 94 and 95: . - _ _ - . - - . .* _ . . . -M1_1-
Page 96 and 97: -. . :a. .\ -. -I- .’ -.., 7 -a!
Page 98 and 99:
- .-_ .! . . . __. _. . ._ 1 _____.
Page 100 and 101:
s-t g CD L-9 "0 aI - - -I -, 6-8 g
Page 102 and 103:
i’ I . . When developed with ing;
Page 104 and 105:
. . are to be developed. Discus6 wi
Page 106 and 107:
--- . . . . Aritm 1 CRTTRRU FOR IDX
Page 108 and 109:
Page 1 GR4ia -- HOS -- Length of Ti
Page 110 and 111:
. . ANNEX 3 CRITERIA FCR PERFORMANC
Page 112 and 113:
. . ‘- -.- . .I : . -.. (. .- ,.
Page 114 and 115:
. . .- . - ., .- 2 :. -W-.l.W.‘..
Page 116 and 117:
. . and performed .the duties 01 th
Page 118 and 119:
’ . I , ._ ..--“.,.-.“..~...;
Page 120 and 121:
. . . - . . . . -.. . ^. ‘. L ,..
Page 122 and 123:
. . . contributions to the fir&l mu
Page 124 and 125:
._ _ --r -. :’ ,--_ .I’- ..__ .
Page 126 and 127:
,’ ‘. ,-- - : ’ ‘.b :’ _.
Page 128 and 129:
.1 , .I . . ., .;., ., _- . -.< “
Page 130 and 131:
. . Test Construction Procedures wI
Page 132 and 133:
. . * .-a . ..” .-. ,. ., “.. _
Page 134 and 135:
Ceoly, W. D., 6 Cratn, J. L. Dual c
Page 136 and 137:
:. ‘ci � � � � � i I 1
Page 138 and 139:
. personnel are assigned to jobe th
Page 140 and 141:
. . _-. .._. -...a_-e,-,. .-Y.-e--.
Page 142 and 143:
The octond 6reA of opercatfon’ fo
Page 144 and 145:
O&#&RAL%YWP011U0111l-SRRS.GE~SEVIF.
Page 146 and 147:
. Systematic upgrading. At the same
Page 148 and 149:
2 . . . - “.,.>__ ., . _ _ _ _ .
Page 150 and 151:
. - . . -.. ..- . .-. .._-,_.-&s -.
Page 152 and 153:
During the post year, the fiOS Eval
Page 154 and 155:
I-- , c Now, an MOS Evaluation Test
Page 156 and 157:
f . Job P.na1ysi.r for Tart Develop
Page 158 and 159:
h. i. 1. k. 1. m. n. . Reproduction
Page 160 and 161:
. . Administration of the Job Inven
Page 162 and 163:
. ‘,‘, . : . . ; . .,--- -. can
Page 164 and 165:
. CL%TiS D. l!CYRIDZ US Army Artill
Page 166 and 167:
When a request was made for the nam
Page 168 and 169:
Item Writing Procedures for IncrasL
Page 170 and 171:
- Preoentation to MTA Panel ConaLde
Page 172 and 173:
-- -- . _ . _-._ ._- --- ..--._. -
Page 174 and 175:
.- We probably ohould not conc1~rn
Page 176 and 177:
. . . LOXCAL EKPIRICAL Content Vall
Page 178 and 179:
, __-____ 14_1- -...-. -- _.._.~ _.
Page 180 and 181:
, .- - L L . -. .--Ly -_ _. - . . \
Page 182 and 183:
._“...- . , ._ I . . ..,_ . _, _
Page 184 and 185:
c r- ’ , L- .’ ./’ / :‘.. p
Page 186 and 187:
ecause we do not like the criteria
Page 188 and 189:
-- ., -__. . . . ,Establlshment has
Page 190 and 191:
. 6. . . . .i 4 * .I .J ,I --. Dunn
Page 192 and 193:
-. Item Writers Aptitude Test Devel
Page 194 and 195:
. i . -- t ! Ens Harold AdaL-an Hr.
Page 196 and 197:
1 / . . . I . Cape Harry H. Craer,
Page 198 and 199:
. ‘. . & . e . Fir. John J. Parke
Page 200 and 201:
6.. , . . 1% + , ,* ___ . ‘. * ,
show all

Technical Report - International Military Testing Association

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?