Technical Report - International Military Testing Association

-
;
,
. -_
. .
. .
.’
,
i:
‘.
:
‘. :
. .
. .
.
.
.
.
ate afoot to bring the two examination programs into closer altgnnent.
It is hoped that through the reorganization vhich is still taking shape
at the Training Center, we will be able to streamline ths execution of
our prarsnt callnitnents. And then we vi11 be able to assume an expanded
� �������
The big questions remain--and probably always vill.
Bow vell do we measure what we are trying to mcaaure? What do ve
wind up meaauting after all?
Are present techniques actually reletting for us the kind of men
we vaTin positions of trust and leadership?
Can ve ever hope to accomplish thin goal with “objective” testing7
If not, to vhat ext@nt are v6 “6tNCtUring” our group and our
rociety with an Inadequate tool?
Perhaps if ve could find the kind of person ve are looking for ve
wouldn’t have to bo EO concerned with “pro-pay,” “fringe beneffts,”
and “morale.”
So once again, we of the Coaat Guard are glad to be here.
We shall look forvard to beneficial changes in our “attitudinal
framer of reference”.
We hope that our “regression equation” canes down.
(And I cartaialy hope that
Thank YOU.
.
17
ie a god thing to hope for!)
i