Technical Report - International Military Testing Association
Technical Report - International Military Testing Association
Technical Report - International Military Testing Association
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
#<br />
___.<br />
-<br />
: ..\ \<br />
c<br />
. .<br />
I<br />
. i<br />
I<br />
1 i<br />
.<br />
.<br />
.<br />
.<br />
.<br />
Screening byppasa cpecfalloc~. The use of the SKT for the identification<br />
of bypass specialists is ohe of these goals. A recruit, &IO has sme ~acialty<br />
backgourd derived from civilian ocoupational experfencc or schooling or fros<br />
prior military service, azy t&e the SKI to ascertain his qunlificntion in the<br />
spec‘lal ty. Cm passing, he is svarded the smtskflfed rating,. Every year the<br />
bypass-specialist program yields significant savircge in term of cfrc-umented<br />
trainfug costs.<br />
Hotivatinq study. There is another goal of the SKT progrran that brings Lt<br />
into an affinitive relationship with the training program. This goal is i-licit<br />
in the publication of study reference lists for the guidance of alrum in preparation<br />
for specialty testing. The effect is to motivate study on the part of the<br />
airman-to kindle his urge to acquire the technical knowledge that is considered<br />
crucial to his successful pcrfo,rmance on the job and to his long-range career<br />
development.<br />
Lrpact on Iraining. As a consequence, preparation for the test become big<br />
businese. &my people get into the act at all levclo. Training program go<br />
into high gear. Tne impact upon training is felt throughout the Air Force, but<br />
nowhere is it felt more acutely than at the Air Training timand, In turn, the<br />
latter undertakes to produce training standard,0 and job informtion for b.ir Porte<br />
publication. r;ot only are these made available to tha traLnee for his use in<br />
preparation for the test, but they ate also adopted by the XT progrfun for input<br />
to the test-construction process.<br />
A r.c*~ epproach to CUT. A noteworthy outcome of the interaction between trainin;>.<br />
and evaluation has been the recent adoption by the Air Force of the dualchannel<br />
concept of on-the-job training. This approach to CUT. provides for the<br />
synchronous development of the airmen’s cereer, on the one hand, and his job proficiency<br />
on the other. The end product of one of these training chaonels is the<br />
Career Development Couree (CCC), which is a self-study course geared to the<br />
aiman’s specialty for his use in preparing for the next higher skill level.<br />
Since it is a self-contained peckage of career specialty information on fundamentals<br />
and basic principles, the CDC is a welcome source reference for use in<br />
SKT construction. Thus has the SKT fulfilled itself, in part, through ite<br />
salutary *act on training.<br />
The isaue of fndependant evaluation, So salutary, in fact, has bean the<br />
two-way interaction between training and evaluation that, for practical purposes,<br />
a sort of symbiotic relationship has emerged betveen the two. The intimacy of<br />
this relationship has been the subject of considerable interpretation and, possibly,<br />
overinterpretation.<br />
-I_ The ca6e against. One strongly voiced interpretation holda that evaluation<br />
should be an integral part of training. Accordfng to this view, the SKT program<br />
would logically be assigned to the Air Training Cormmnd. It ie maintained that<br />
the closest possible coordination 1s needed to effect greater efficiency and<br />
economy of test production. Such a wedding would eupposedly enhance the mutually<br />
supporting relatfonehip between the two functions. Thus a higher degree of mutual<br />
responsiveness would become possible In a more intimate association.<br />
139<br />
;<br />
i<br />
,i