Technical Report - International Military Testing Association

--
1
. *
__-_..___ __.-_.- I .
� �
. .
�
._ _, _.-_l ____- -..c--..- -_.--- . ..-- .___ll-l.
Table 2b
Intrrcorreletkms kaong Pear Rating8 on Effort end
lntelligmce end Achievmmt Index
1. Peer Rrtlngg--ori Xntelligenee
2. Peer htingr 00 I!ffort
3. intelligence (#my CCT)
4. Aehievaent Index
b. Stebilicy of the Achievasaat Index:
1. 2. 3. 4.
- .66 .46 .46
e .29 A0
m .lO
The � ecxmd quution invclvea the relfrbility of the
ehievement index. fafcrrmti~ on thle quartloo. ~08 drawn from enother
� tudy Involving 196 8tUdMt8 for the Aviation Structural Mechanic School
at Kemphis. Correlations wre obtofnod brtww tha achievePant index
derived urly in training end at the end of treiaiq in two 8chooli.
h e COlTOl~tiCm8 cbtelmd wro .69 and .35. fii8 indlcatu a noderate
atability in the achfevtnant index. At leeat, it indicator thet the
re8iduel fr not compared entirely of random error.
2. Uotlvation Uea8uranmt. tteyo e n d Umnning. l!ducetiaul and
P8ychological Hsrrurazmx. Volume 21, #usher 1, 1961.
lhir rtudy invertl~.&tul enothor bark arpect of the � chieveeeat
index, nrrnoly the prediction of � rubrequent � cklevaent index by e
orriety of motivation meaoure# Including en early achlevment index.
Actually, the echievanmt index in thlr inrtanco took cho form of a
part corroletion fnrtud of e ratio of obrerved to prullcted achievemmt.
A8 we indiceted before, there WO 8tetfetiC8 � re 0888ntldly
rimiler.
The mocLvrtfon meaeure8 uaployed wore:
a. Peor retlng cm offott
b. Self r*ttngr on effort
C. Chock llrt o f rtudeat behavior
d . Pietorte Nearurea
-._ ----- ----I’
.
,
61
.
, .