30.03.2015 Views

to download Telecom Italia Annual Report 2011 - Company Reporting

to download Telecom Italia Annual Report 2011 - Company Reporting

to download Telecom Italia Annual Report 2011 - Company Reporting

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

outcome is considered probable. As a result a specific provision of a relatively minor amount, which fully<br />

covers the risk has been made.<br />

─ ● ─<br />

It should be noted that for some disputes, described below, on the basis of the information available at<br />

the closing date of the financial statements and with particular reference <strong>to</strong> the complexity of the<br />

proceedings, <strong>to</strong> their progress, and <strong>to</strong> elements of uncertainty of a technical - trial nature, it was not<br />

possible <strong>to</strong> make a reliable estimate of the size and/or times of any payments. Moreover, in the case in<br />

which the diffusion of information relative <strong>to</strong> the dispute could seriously jeopardise the position of<br />

<strong>Telecom</strong> <strong>Italia</strong> or its subsidiaries, only the general nature of the dispute is described.<br />

Antitrust Case A426<br />

On May, 13 2010, following a complaint lodged by Fastweb, the <strong>Italia</strong>n Antitrust Authority (AGCM)<br />

started an investigation in<strong>to</strong> an alleged abuse of dominant position by <strong>Telecom</strong> <strong>Italia</strong>. According <strong>to</strong><br />

Fastweb, <strong>Telecom</strong> <strong>Italia</strong> acted so as <strong>to</strong> exclude its competi<strong>to</strong>rs in the public tenders held in 2010 by<br />

Consip and Enel for the award of contracts for fixed telephony services and IP connectivity. In particular,<br />

according <strong>to</strong> the complainant, <strong>Telecom</strong> <strong>Italia</strong> did not provide its competi<strong>to</strong>rs with some pieces of<br />

information of a technical-economic nature that were allegedly essential for the submission of<br />

competitive bids, and provided its retail divisions with network services at more favourable conditions<br />

than those applied <strong>to</strong> all other opera<strong>to</strong>rs.<br />

Fastweb had previously filed a similar complaint <strong>to</strong> AGCom which wholly dismissed the case in a note<br />

issued on May, 26 2010.<br />

While reiterating that it had always acted in full compliance with the applicable regulations, <strong>Telecom</strong><br />

<strong>Italia</strong> filed a proposal of undertakings in order <strong>to</strong> remove all the concerns set forth in the AGCM decision<br />

<strong>to</strong> open the investigation. Considering that said proposal was not manifestly meritless, AGCM published<br />

it on its website on July, 29 <strong>2011</strong>, inviting comments from interested third parties.<br />

<strong>Telecom</strong> <strong>Italia</strong> subsequently presented amendments <strong>to</strong> the proposal of undertakings, which the<br />

interested third parties made comments on. <strong>Telecom</strong> <strong>Italia</strong> submitted its responses <strong>to</strong> the comments<br />

from interested third parties on both proposals.<br />

Since the procedure <strong>to</strong> evaluate the undertakings is still underway, it is not possible <strong>to</strong> opine about the<br />

outcome of the proceedings.<br />

Antitrust Case A428<br />

On June, 23 2010, prompted by complaints filed by Wind and Fastweb, AGCM started an investigation<br />

in<strong>to</strong> two alleged abuses of dominant position by <strong>Telecom</strong> <strong>Italia</strong>. Firstly, according <strong>to</strong> Wind, <strong>Telecom</strong> <strong>Italia</strong><br />

allegedly hindered or delayed the activation of services, by means of unjustified and spurious refusals (<br />

so-called K.O.) Moreover, according <strong>to</strong> both complainants, <strong>Telecom</strong> <strong>Italia</strong> allegedly offered its access<br />

services <strong>to</strong> final cus<strong>to</strong>mers at economic and technical conditions that could allegedly not be matched by<br />

competi<strong>to</strong>rs purchasing wholesale access services from <strong>Telecom</strong> <strong>Italia</strong> itself, only in those geographic<br />

areas of the Country where disaggregated access services <strong>to</strong> the local network are available, and hence<br />

where other opera<strong>to</strong>rs can compete more fiercely.<br />

In any case, with reference <strong>to</strong> one of the offers complained of (relating <strong>to</strong> an invitation <strong>to</strong> tender issued<br />

by the Florence municipal authority), on February, 1 <strong>2011</strong>, AGCom closed its investigation on the<br />

economic terms of <strong>Telecom</strong> <strong>Italia</strong>’s offer with regard <strong>to</strong> traffic services, after verifying that it could be<br />

matched by its competi<strong>to</strong>rs.<br />

While reiterating that it had always acted in full compliance with the applicable regulations, <strong>Telecom</strong><br />

<strong>Italia</strong> filed a proposal of undertakings in order <strong>to</strong> remove all the concerns set forth in the AGCM decision<br />

<strong>to</strong> open the investigation. Considering that said proposal was not manifestly meritless, AGCM published<br />

it on its website on August, 5 <strong>2011</strong>, inviting comments from interested third parties.<br />

On March, 26 2012, AGCM rejected <strong>Telecom</strong> <strong>Italia</strong>’s proposal of undertakings; the investigation set <strong>to</strong><br />

be concluded on September, 30 2012 therefore continues. At present, it is not possible <strong>to</strong> opine about<br />

the outcome of the proceedings.<br />

<strong>Telecom</strong> <strong>Italia</strong> S.p.A. Separate Financial Statements<br />

Note 22 – Contingent liabilities, other information, commitments and<br />

guarantees<br />

389

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!