FINAL SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PLAN - Documents for Moffett Field
FINAL SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PLAN - Documents for Moffett Field
FINAL SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PLAN - Documents for Moffett Field
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Table 35-1. Validation Process<br />
Step<br />
IIa/IIb 1 Validation Input Description<br />
IIa<br />
IIa<br />
IIa<br />
IIb<br />
IIb<br />
IIb<br />
IIb<br />
IIb<br />
IIb<br />
IIb<br />
IIb<br />
IIb<br />
IIb<br />
Communication<br />
Audits<br />
Step IIa<br />
Validation Report<br />
Data Deliverables<br />
and SAP<br />
Deviations<br />
Sampling Plan<br />
Sampling<br />
Procedures<br />
<strong>Field</strong> Duplicates<br />
Project<br />
Quantitation<br />
Limits<br />
Confirmatory<br />
Analysis<br />
Per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />
Criteria<br />
Data Qualifiers<br />
Step IIb<br />
Validation Report<br />
Establish that required communication procedures<br />
were followed by field or laboratory personnel.<br />
Review laboratory audit reports, accreditation, and<br />
certification records <strong>for</strong> the laboratory’s per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />
on specific methods. Conduct field audit to verify<br />
compliance with planned procedures.<br />
Summarize deviations from methods, procedures, or<br />
contracts. Include qualified data and explanation of all<br />
data qualifiers.<br />
Ensure that the data report from Step IIa was<br />
provided.<br />
Determine the impacts of any deviations from<br />
sampling or analytical methods and SOPs. For<br />
example, confirm that the methods given in the SAP<br />
were used and, if they were not, determine if data still<br />
meet MPCs. Consider the effectiveness and<br />
appropriateness of any corrective action.<br />
Determine whether the sampling plan was executed<br />
as specified (i.e. the number, location, and type of<br />
field samples were collected and analyzed as<br />
specified in the SAP).<br />
Evaluate whether sampling procedures were followed<br />
with respect to equipment and proper sampling<br />
support (e.g. techniques, equipment,<br />
decontamination, volume, temperature, preservatives,<br />
etc.).<br />
Compare results of collocated field duplicates with<br />
criteria established in the SAP.<br />
Determine that quantitation limits were achieved, as<br />
outlined in the SAP, and that the laboratory<br />
successfully analyzed a standard at the QL.<br />
Evaluate agreement of laboratory results.<br />
Evaluate QC data against project-specific<br />
per<strong>for</strong>mance criteria in the SAP (i.e. evaluate quality<br />
parameters beyond those outlined in the methods).<br />
Determine that the data qualifiers applied in step IIa<br />
were those specified in the SAP and that any<br />
deviations from specifications were justified.<br />
Summarize outcome of comparison of data to MPC in<br />
the SAP. Include qualified data and explanation of all<br />
data qualifiers.<br />
Responsible <strong>for</strong><br />
Validation<br />
(name, organization)<br />
Danille<br />
Jorgensen/AMEC<br />
Danille<br />
Jorgensen/AMEC<br />
Mary Schneider/AMEC<br />
Jeanne Peterson/ AQA<br />
Danille<br />
Jorgensen/AMEC<br />
Danille<br />
Jorgensen/AMEC<br />
Danille<br />
Jorgensen/AMEC<br />
Danille<br />
Jorgensen/AMEC<br />
Danille<br />
Jorgensen/AMEC<br />
Danille<br />
Jorgensen/AMEC<br />
Danille<br />
Jorgensen/AMEC<br />
Danille<br />
Jorgensen/AMEC<br />
Danille<br />
Jorgensen/AMEC<br />
Danille<br />
Jorgensen/AMEC<br />
Note:<br />
1<br />
IIa-compliance with methods, procedures, and contracts [see Table 10, page 117, UFP-QAPP manual, V.1, March<br />
2005.]<br />
IIb-comparison with measurement per<strong>for</strong>mance criteria in the SAP [see Table 11, page 118, UFP-QAPP manual, V.1,<br />
March 2005]<br />
Final Sampling and Analysis Plan<br />
Installation Restoration Site 29, Hangar 1<br />
Former Naval Air Station, <strong>Moffett</strong> <strong>Field</strong>, <strong>Moffett</strong> <strong>Field</strong>, Cali<strong>for</strong>nia<br />
DCN: AMEC-8816-0005-0039<br />
April 2010<br />
Page 35-2
Change language