FINAL SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PLAN - Documents for Moffett Field

J - estimated concentration
R - rejected value (unusable)
N - presumed identity
U - not detected (e.g. not present based on blank contamination)
UJ - sample detection limit is estimated.
Data validation will be patterned after CLP NFG. The objectives, evaluations, and actions
employed during the data validation process will follow those outlined in the NFG.
Differences between NFG and project validation procedures will include; review items and
data validation criteria. The laboratory will be permitted to provide CLP-like forms in lieu
of true CLP forms. The data validation criteria will not adhere to NFG but will be based on
method criteria for preservation, holding times, instrument tuning, calibration, instrument
performance checks, internal standard responses, serial dilutions, and target compound ID;
laboratory-specified criteria for surrogate, laboratory control samples, laboratory
duplicates, and matrix spikes; and the validator’s professional judgment.
Step
IIa/ IIb
Matrix
IIa/IIb Wipe Lead
IIa/IIb Wipe PCBs
IIa/IIb Soil Lead
IIa/IIb Soil PCBs
Table 36-1. Analytical Data Validation Summary
Analytical
Group
Validation Criteria
EPA Method 6010B; EWI #1,
DoD QSM
EPA Method 8082, EWI #1,
DoD QSM
EPA Method 6010B; EWI #1,
DoD QSM
EPA Method 8082, EWI #1,
DoD QSM
Data Validator
(title and organizational
affiliation)
IIa: Jeanne Peterson/ AQA
IIb: Danille Jorgensen, AMEC
IIa: Jeanne Peterson/ AQA
IIb: Danille Jorgensen, AMEC
IIa: Jeanne Peterson/ AQA
IIb: Danille Jorgensen, AMEC
IIa: Jeanne Peterson/ AQA
IIb: Danille Jorgensen, AMEC
Final Sampling and Analysis Plan
Installation Restoration Site 29, Hangar 1
Former Naval Air Station, Moffett Field, Moffett Field, California
DCN: AMEC-8816-0005-0039
April 2010
Page 36-2