14.05.2015 Views

Management Rights - AELE's Home Page

Management Rights - AELE's Home Page

Management Rights - AELE's Home Page

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Light Duty 11-2<br />

leave if they are capable of performing in a light duty capacity.<br />

Presumably the full Commission will clarify this issue at the appropriate<br />

time. However, the results reached by Hearing Officers will probably not<br />

change, only the reasoning. If an employer has traditionally allowed<br />

public safety employees to remain on 111F leave until able to perform all<br />

the duties to which they might possibly be assigned, notice and an<br />

opportunity to bargain will be required before such 111F eligibility criteria<br />

are changed or, more properly, before assigning such partially disabled<br />

employees to a light duty position.<br />

A more logical approach would be for the Commission to recognize the<br />

employer's right to create a light duty position and to require a municipal<br />

employer to provide notice and an opportunity to bargain, if the union so<br />

requests, before assigning bargaining unit members to such duty for the<br />

first time. It is arguable that the creation of a light duty assignment is no<br />

different from creating such positions as prosecutor, planning officer,<br />

school liaison officer, training officer, records officer or desk officer. In fact,<br />

some departments utilize exactly those assignments when requiring a<br />

partially disabled (sick or injured on duty) employee to return to work.<br />

With this approach, a <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> clause which allows for the<br />

creation of such positions as the employer deems necessary or<br />

appropriate, should encompass a light duty position which involves duties<br />

reasonably expected of police officers or firefighters.<br />

Changing the shift of those on leave under § 111F requires notice and, if<br />

requested, bargaining with the affected union. This was the decision<br />

reached by an LRC Hearing Officer in a 1991 case involving the Natick<br />

Police Department. 5 In that case the Acting Police Chief issued a<br />

memorandum which altered the department's past practice of allowing<br />

officers who were on injured on duty leave to remain administratively on<br />

the shift to which they had been assigned at the time of their injury.<br />

Officers on 111F leave were reassigned administratively to the 8:00 a.m. to<br />

4:00 p.m. shift. Among other things, this change was intended to<br />

eliminate eligibility for night shift differential.<br />

PRACTICE POINTERS<br />

So long as the employer meets its bargaining obligations (e.g., notice and<br />

opportunity to bargain) and does not violate a specific provision of the<br />

collective bargaining agreement, it could adopt a policy of administratively<br />

reassigning all sick or injured (on and off duty) employees to the day shift.<br />

The reassignment of injured or even sick employees to the day shift may<br />

also result in other benefits. For example, should the employee be required<br />

to be examined by a municipally-designated physician, to report to the<br />

station for a conference with the chief, or to attend a court hearing on<br />

Commonwealth of Massachusetts

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!