14.05.2015 Views

Management Rights - AELE's Home Page

Management Rights - AELE's Home Page

Management Rights - AELE's Home Page

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Minimum Staffing 15-2<br />

A municipal employer may not submit a funding request to meet its<br />

obligations under a minimum staffing clause which is contingent on a<br />

Proposition 2 ½ override. 6<br />

In a 2005 case, the Town of Bedford brought an action to vacate an<br />

arbitration award pursuant to G.L. c. 150C, § 11(a)(3). The Town<br />

contended that it did not violate the collective bargaining agreement when<br />

the Chief of the Fire Department unilaterally changed the number of callback<br />

firefighters from four to three. The Town argued that this type of<br />

decision fals within the Chief’s managerial prerogative and is not the<br />

proper subject of arbitration.<br />

The court’s review of an arbitrator’s decision is governed by G.L. c. 150C, §<br />

11E, and is limited in scope. 7 “Courts inquire into an arbitration award<br />

only to determine if the arbitrator has exceeded the scope of his authority,<br />

or decided the mater based on fraud, arbitrary conduct or procedural<br />

irregularity in the hearings.” 8 “An arbitrator exceeds his authority by<br />

granting relief beyond the scope of the arbitration agreement . . . by<br />

awarding relief beyond that which the parties bound themselves . . . or by<br />

awarding relief prohibited bylaw.” 9<br />

The Town argued that issues concerning call-back procedures should not<br />

have been submitted to arbitration because the subject is reserved for the<br />

Town’s discretion under a managerial rights theory. The Union contended<br />

that call-back procedures are not managerial prerogatives, but even if they<br />

are so construed, the call-back provision was at least enforceable during<br />

the first year of the agreement.<br />

When one party to a collective bargaining agreement is a public employer,<br />

there are certain subjects that cannot be arbitrated, even if they<br />

inadvertently become part of an agreement. The courts have held that<br />

some subjects are so central to the role of a government agency and its<br />

accountability in the political process, that decisions regarding these<br />

topics are reserved for the sole discretion of the public employer. 10 These<br />

subjects are considered non-delegable rights of management “that a<br />

municipality and its agents may not abandon by agreement, and that an<br />

arbitrator may not contravene.” 11 “[T]o the extent subjects within that<br />

zone find their way into a collective bargaining agreement, the provisions<br />

of the colective bargaining agreement are not enforceable.” 12 While<br />

determinations of staffing levels that affect public safety might appear to<br />

be non-delegable management prerogatives that are “beyond the scope of<br />

public sector bargaining.” 13 The Supreme Judicial Court has held that<br />

minimum staffing requirements that are, or are similar to job security<br />

provisions, such as the minimum number of firefighters required to be on<br />

duty at any time, are enforceable for periods not exceeding one fiscal<br />

year. 14 The Court reached this conclusion despite its express recognition<br />

Commonwealth of Massachusetts

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!