Management Rights - AELE's Home Page
Management Rights - AELE's Home Page
Management Rights - AELE's Home Page
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Minimum Staffing 15-2<br />
A municipal employer may not submit a funding request to meet its<br />
obligations under a minimum staffing clause which is contingent on a<br />
Proposition 2 ½ override. 6<br />
In a 2005 case, the Town of Bedford brought an action to vacate an<br />
arbitration award pursuant to G.L. c. 150C, § 11(a)(3). The Town<br />
contended that it did not violate the collective bargaining agreement when<br />
the Chief of the Fire Department unilaterally changed the number of callback<br />
firefighters from four to three. The Town argued that this type of<br />
decision fals within the Chief’s managerial prerogative and is not the<br />
proper subject of arbitration.<br />
The court’s review of an arbitrator’s decision is governed by G.L. c. 150C, §<br />
11E, and is limited in scope. 7 “Courts inquire into an arbitration award<br />
only to determine if the arbitrator has exceeded the scope of his authority,<br />
or decided the mater based on fraud, arbitrary conduct or procedural<br />
irregularity in the hearings.” 8 “An arbitrator exceeds his authority by<br />
granting relief beyond the scope of the arbitration agreement . . . by<br />
awarding relief beyond that which the parties bound themselves . . . or by<br />
awarding relief prohibited bylaw.” 9<br />
The Town argued that issues concerning call-back procedures should not<br />
have been submitted to arbitration because the subject is reserved for the<br />
Town’s discretion under a managerial rights theory. The Union contended<br />
that call-back procedures are not managerial prerogatives, but even if they<br />
are so construed, the call-back provision was at least enforceable during<br />
the first year of the agreement.<br />
When one party to a collective bargaining agreement is a public employer,<br />
there are certain subjects that cannot be arbitrated, even if they<br />
inadvertently become part of an agreement. The courts have held that<br />
some subjects are so central to the role of a government agency and its<br />
accountability in the political process, that decisions regarding these<br />
topics are reserved for the sole discretion of the public employer. 10 These<br />
subjects are considered non-delegable rights of management “that a<br />
municipality and its agents may not abandon by agreement, and that an<br />
arbitrator may not contravene.” 11 “[T]o the extent subjects within that<br />
zone find their way into a collective bargaining agreement, the provisions<br />
of the colective bargaining agreement are not enforceable.” 12 While<br />
determinations of staffing levels that affect public safety might appear to<br />
be non-delegable management prerogatives that are “beyond the scope of<br />
public sector bargaining.” 13 The Supreme Judicial Court has held that<br />
minimum staffing requirements that are, or are similar to job security<br />
provisions, such as the minimum number of firefighters required to be on<br />
duty at any time, are enforceable for periods not exceeding one fiscal<br />
year. 14 The Court reached this conclusion despite its express recognition<br />
Commonwealth of Massachusetts