14.05.2015 Views

Management Rights - AELE's Home Page

Management Rights - AELE's Home Page

Management Rights - AELE's Home Page

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Workplace Rules and Practices 13-10<br />

In contexts other than pubic safety, uniforms and grooming standards are<br />

common workplace practices (especially for hospital employees,<br />

maintenance workers, customer service types of positions, etc.), and are<br />

similarly upheld as long as they are not irrational or unreasonable.<br />

Typically, collective bargaining involving dress codes will focus on cleaning<br />

or uniform allowances. One of the few LRC cases dealing with dress<br />

standards involved a dispute over whether an employer was required<br />

retroactively to pay a cleaning allowance negotiated in a contract. 77 The<br />

LRC determined that where there was no specific agreement to make the<br />

cleaning allowance provision retroactive, and where there had been no<br />

past practice of providing such an allowance, the employer was not<br />

required to pay the retroactive allowance. 78<br />

PRACTICE POINTERS<br />

Chiefs are free to set and enforce hair and grooming standards. This<br />

includes rules concerning beards, mustaches, hair length, sideburns,<br />

visible tattoos, body piercing and jewelry. If no rule currently exists, the<br />

chief should provide the union with notice and opportunity to bargain<br />

before implementing a change. If the rule exists but has not been enforced<br />

for some time or not consistently, the chief need only advise the union and<br />

the employees that he/she intends to start enforcing the rule, giving<br />

sufficient notice so the employees can comply.<br />

Occasionally the growing of beards or long hair is done as a gesture of<br />

defiance or in protest of some actions of the chief or the municipality.<br />

Assuming there was no written rule on the subject, some chiefs have felt<br />

powerless to enforce what they believed was an “unwriten rule” for as<br />

long as they could remember. While the area is not free from doubt, it<br />

would appear that a prompt meeting with the employees involved as well<br />

as with the union would be an appropriate first step. The chief could order<br />

employees to shave and suspend (or so recommend to the appointing<br />

authority) such individuals until they comply. Rather than having a<br />

member be disciplined for insubordination, the union will probably advise<br />

the employee to obey and file a prohibited practice charge at the LRC. The<br />

chief should inform the union in writing that he/she is willing to negotiate<br />

if they so request; however, in the mean time the same status quo which<br />

has existed for years (i.e., beard-free) will be maintained.<br />

To avoid the practical problems likely to result from objectionable tattoos or<br />

visible body piercing, chiefs should promulgate rules before the need<br />

arises. It is simple to order an employee to remove an earring. It is not so<br />

easy to make a tatoo go away from one’s face, neck or forearms.<br />

The decision of what items will be worn on uniforms is a management<br />

right. If union pins start appearing, and the chief objects, he/she may<br />

Commonwealth of Massachusetts

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!