14.05.2015 Views

Management Rights - AELE's Home Page

Management Rights - AELE's Home Page

Management Rights - AELE's Home Page

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Workplace Rules and Practices 13-12<br />

Similarly, the Appeals Court upheld, in Mello v. Mayor of Fall River, the<br />

dismissal of a tenured civil service employee on the grounds of her moving<br />

outside of the city in violation of the residency requirement for city<br />

employees. 87 Moreover, the Court in Mello did not even require the City<br />

Council to make explicit findings, in enacting the ordinance, as to the<br />

importance and benefits to the city of the municipal employee residency<br />

requirement. 88<br />

In a 2003 case involving the Brockton Police Department, the Appeals<br />

Court held that residency clause in collective bargaining agreement, in<br />

which parties agreed that previously enacted ordinance requiring law<br />

enforcement officers to be city residents would be enforced only against<br />

officers hired after specified date, was lawful, as applied to officers hired<br />

prior to agreement’s date.<br />

§ 8 TRANSFERS<br />

The Joint Labor <strong>Management</strong> Committee (JLMC) statute lists the right to<br />

transfer police oficers as a mater of “inherent managerial policy”.<br />

Although the wording is not clear, it appears that at least in firefighter<br />

situations, “the subject mater of transfer shal not bewithin the scope of<br />

arbitration, provided, however, that the subject matters of relationship of<br />

seniority to transfers and disciplinary and punitive transfers shall be<br />

within the scope of arbitration.” The transfer cases which the LRC has<br />

decided have not involved police or fire service situations.<br />

A public employer is free to transfer employees at will, as long as: 1) the<br />

motivation for the transfer was not related to the employee’s union<br />

activities, 89 and 2) the transfer was not in violation of the collective<br />

bargaining agreement. Thus, the employer may not discriminate against<br />

an employee with respect to his or her union activities by transferring him<br />

or her. 90 Also, at least in non-public safety situations, if the employer has<br />

entered into an agreement with the union or has been subject to an<br />

arbitration award with respect to transferring employees, the employer<br />

may not violate the agreement. 91<br />

In the education context, the involuntary transfer procedure for teachers<br />

is not a “hiring decision” under the education reform act, but a proper<br />

subject for a collective bargaining agreement. 92<br />

PRACTICE POINTERS<br />

In many ways, the exercise of the rights of transfer and assignment<br />

appear similar. A chief has traditionally used the power to transfer<br />

employees as an informal disciplinary tool. At least in firefighter cases,<br />

Commonwealth of Massachusetts

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!