Management Rights - AELE's Home Page
Management Rights - AELE's Home Page
Management Rights - AELE's Home Page
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Bargaining Unit Work 8-4<br />
The Commonwealth additionally contended that it had no duty to bargain<br />
with the Union because revocation of the on-call list was a managerial<br />
decision concerning the provision of services. Decisions concerning the<br />
deployment of public services are management prerogatives, not subject to<br />
bargaining. 24 (City's decision to provide fire prevention inspections at a<br />
vacant school building constitutes a level of services decision) 25 ; (the<br />
number of custodians assigned to each building is a managerial<br />
decision) 26 ; (decision concerning whether to require police presence at<br />
certain construction details is a core governmental decision impacting the<br />
level of services to be offered.)<br />
Relying on Town of Dennis 27 , the Commonwealth asserted that due to the<br />
extremely low numbers of requests for assistance from the DEA with<br />
clandestine lab investigations, 24-hour on-call duty by chemists was no<br />
longer warranted. In Town of Dennis, the Commission found that the<br />
Town's decision to discontinue providing private police details at liquor<br />
service establishments was a level of service decision, and determined that<br />
the Town was only required to bargain over any impacts of that decision<br />
on bargaining unit members. 28 However, the LRC determined that this<br />
case does not concern a level of services decision because the DSP<br />
continues to provide 24-hour, seven day a week coverage for calls from the<br />
DEA requesting assistance with clandestine lab investigations. Moreover,<br />
the Commission has held that where the same services previously<br />
performed by unit employees are to still be used by the employer in its<br />
operations, but are to be performed by non-unit employees, the bargaining<br />
obligation will arise unless the employer can show a compelling<br />
nondiscriminatory reason why it should be excused from the obligation. 29<br />
Although the Commonwealth alleged that the chemists' on-call duty for<br />
clandestine lab investigations was costly and unnecessary given the small<br />
number of requests for assistance from the DEA, the Commission did not<br />
find that these reasons to be sufficiently compelling to excuse its duty to<br />
bargain with the Union over the transfer of that on-call duty to<br />
management personnel. Lastly, the Commission noted that even if this<br />
case concerned a level of services decision, the Commonwealth was still<br />
required to bargain with the Union over the impacts of the decision to<br />
transfer stand-by duty. 30 There was no evidence that the Commonwealth<br />
bargained over the impacts of the decision to transfer on-call duty from<br />
bargaining unit members to management personnel.<br />
For all of the above reasons, the Commission concluded that the<br />
Commonwealth violated the Law by transferring on-call duty from<br />
bargaining unit members to non-unit personnel without first giving the<br />
Union notice and an opportunity to bargain to resolution or impasse.<br />
Commonwealth of Massachusetts