14.05.2015 Views

Management Rights - AELE's Home Page

Management Rights - AELE's Home Page

Management Rights - AELE's Home Page

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Bargaining Unit Work 8-4<br />

The Commonwealth additionally contended that it had no duty to bargain<br />

with the Union because revocation of the on-call list was a managerial<br />

decision concerning the provision of services. Decisions concerning the<br />

deployment of public services are management prerogatives, not subject to<br />

bargaining. 24 (City's decision to provide fire prevention inspections at a<br />

vacant school building constitutes a level of services decision) 25 ; (the<br />

number of custodians assigned to each building is a managerial<br />

decision) 26 ; (decision concerning whether to require police presence at<br />

certain construction details is a core governmental decision impacting the<br />

level of services to be offered.)<br />

Relying on Town of Dennis 27 , the Commonwealth asserted that due to the<br />

extremely low numbers of requests for assistance from the DEA with<br />

clandestine lab investigations, 24-hour on-call duty by chemists was no<br />

longer warranted. In Town of Dennis, the Commission found that the<br />

Town's decision to discontinue providing private police details at liquor<br />

service establishments was a level of service decision, and determined that<br />

the Town was only required to bargain over any impacts of that decision<br />

on bargaining unit members. 28 However, the LRC determined that this<br />

case does not concern a level of services decision because the DSP<br />

continues to provide 24-hour, seven day a week coverage for calls from the<br />

DEA requesting assistance with clandestine lab investigations. Moreover,<br />

the Commission has held that where the same services previously<br />

performed by unit employees are to still be used by the employer in its<br />

operations, but are to be performed by non-unit employees, the bargaining<br />

obligation will arise unless the employer can show a compelling<br />

nondiscriminatory reason why it should be excused from the obligation. 29<br />

Although the Commonwealth alleged that the chemists' on-call duty for<br />

clandestine lab investigations was costly and unnecessary given the small<br />

number of requests for assistance from the DEA, the Commission did not<br />

find that these reasons to be sufficiently compelling to excuse its duty to<br />

bargain with the Union over the transfer of that on-call duty to<br />

management personnel. Lastly, the Commission noted that even if this<br />

case concerned a level of services decision, the Commonwealth was still<br />

required to bargain with the Union over the impacts of the decision to<br />

transfer stand-by duty. 30 There was no evidence that the Commonwealth<br />

bargained over the impacts of the decision to transfer on-call duty from<br />

bargaining unit members to management personnel.<br />

For all of the above reasons, the Commission concluded that the<br />

Commonwealth violated the Law by transferring on-call duty from<br />

bargaining unit members to non-unit personnel without first giving the<br />

Union notice and an opportunity to bargain to resolution or impasse.<br />

Commonwealth of Massachusetts

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!