14.05.2015 Views

Management Rights - AELE's Home Page

Management Rights - AELE's Home Page

Management Rights - AELE's Home Page

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Workplace Rules and Practices 13-15<br />

including how the City chose to deploy its law enforcement resources. 104<br />

The City made the policy decision that in certain situations involving<br />

individuals that were armed with an edged weapon, its police officers<br />

should have the option of using a weapon and ammunition that<br />

administered a type of force that fell somewhere between lethal force and<br />

non-lethal force on the force continuum. Although the City’s decision to<br />

have certain unit members use the specialized shotguns and<br />

ammunition as part of the less lethal force policy was excepted from the<br />

statutory bargaining obligation, the City was nevertheless required to<br />

negotiate over the impacts of that core governmental decision on<br />

mandatory subjects of bargaining prior to implementation. 105 The issue<br />

was whether the City failed to bargain in good faith by requiring certain<br />

unit members to use beanbag shotguns and supersock ammunition as<br />

part of a less–lethal force policy without giving the union an opportunity<br />

to bargain to resolution or impasse over the impacts of that decision on<br />

the terms and conditions of employment of unit members. The<br />

Commission previously decided that an increase or change in employees’<br />

job duties, compulsory training, and workload are mandatory subjects of<br />

bargaining. 106 Here, as a result of the City’s decision to deploy the<br />

beanbag shotgun and supersock rounds as part of a less lethal force<br />

policy, the City required patrol supervisors, who were bargaining unit<br />

members, to undergo mandatory training four times per year. Further,<br />

thepatrol supervisor’s job duties had changed because they were now<br />

responsible for deciding whether the beanbag shotgun should be<br />

deployed at a particular incident scene and for actually firing the<br />

weapon. Finally, the workload of the district lieutenants who were also<br />

bargaining unit members increased because the district lieutenants<br />

became responsible for securing the weapon between shifts and<br />

conducting weekly inspections of the weapons and the ammunition.<br />

Having decided that the City had an obligation to bargain with the union<br />

over the impacts of the specialized shotgun and ammunition on the<br />

terms and conditions of employment of unit members, the only<br />

remaining issue was whether the parties bargained to impasse.<br />

§ 10 OFF-DUTY EMPLOYMENT<br />

A municipality has the right to regulate the off-duty employment of law<br />

enforcement officers. The emergency nature of law enforcement, the need<br />

to ensure that officers report for duty in good physical and mental<br />

condition, and the need to avoid conflicts of interest, all combine to justify<br />

a department’s regulation (or even prohibition) of of-duty employment. 107<br />

The Supreme Judicial Court has held that while the opportunity to earn a<br />

living is certainly fundamental in our society, “it is an equaly basic axiom<br />

that there is no right to public employment.” 108 Thus, a police department<br />

may restrict outside employment as a condition of employment for police<br />

Massachusetts Municipal Police Training Committee

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!