14.05.2015 Views

Management Rights - AELE's Home Page

Management Rights - AELE's Home Page

Management Rights - AELE's Home Page

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Changing Schedules 14-2<br />

§ 1 CONTRACTUAL CONSTRAINTS<br />

Some collective bargaining agreements include a provision prohibiting the<br />

changing of shifts to avoid overtime. It is unlikely that an arbitrator would<br />

approve a unilateral shift change in such case, regardless of the economic<br />

or business justification.<br />

Other contractual provisions, while not specifically referencing restrictions<br />

on shift changes, may have similar effects. For example, some contracts<br />

specify the only authorized shift schedules to which members of the<br />

bargaining unit may be assigned. On the other hand, where a collective<br />

bargaining agreement specifies how schedule changes are to be<br />

accomplished, such a provision is likely to be controlling, at least for the<br />

life of the contract. In the absence of any reference to how and when<br />

schedule changes may be made, both parties will be left to argue over<br />

whether and under what circumstances management may change<br />

workers' schedules.<br />

§ 2 NORMAL WORK-WEEK CLAUSES<br />

Contracts which contain clauses describing a “normal” or “standard”<br />

work-week or shift usually do not prevent an employer from changing<br />

existing schedules or creating new shifts. From a management point of<br />

view, there is little, if any, benefit from including a listing of shifts in a<br />

collective bargaining agreement. In the Georgia-Pacific Corp. 1978<br />

arbitration case, the arbitrator stated, "(t)he very notion of normal hours of<br />

work suggests there may be times when abnormal hours are necessary<br />

and proper, if such a shift is fully justified by operational or production<br />

requirements -- in other words if business conditions dictate." 2 While this<br />

is consistent with the majority view, there are some arbitrators who have<br />

reached opposite results. 3 While it is not absolutely necessary when such<br />

normal work week clauses are included, it is advisable to add a provision<br />

similar to the following language contained in a contract involved in the<br />

1962 Stanley Works arbitration case:<br />

This article shall not be construed to be a<br />

guarantee of hours of work per day or per week.<br />

Determination of daily or weekly work schedules<br />

shall be made by the [city/town/chief] and such<br />

schedules may be changed by the<br />

[city/town/chief] from time to time to suit the<br />

needs of the [city/town and department];<br />

provided that the changes deemed necessary . . .<br />

shall be made known to the union<br />

Commonwealth of Massachusetts

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!