14.05.2015 Views

Management Rights - AELE's Home Page

Management Rights - AELE's Home Page

Management Rights - AELE's Home Page

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Employee Performance 17-4<br />

compelling interest in maintaining a qualified work force to justify the use<br />

of psychological tests. 40<br />

In addition to constitutional challenges, employees have challenged the<br />

use of psychological tests for particular purposes. Nonetheless, courts<br />

have upheld the use of psychological tests for applicants, 41 probationary<br />

employees, 42 employees exhibiting erratic behavior, 43 and random or<br />

periodic testing (without cause). 44 Moreover, an employee lawfully<br />

requested to perform a psychological evaluation may be disciplined if<br />

he/she or she refuses to submit to the exam. 45 Also, an employee may<br />

not insist on having a lawyer present during the exam. 46<br />

Typically, drug and alcohol testing is treated in a similar manner to<br />

psychological testing. Substance testing, according to the LRC, is a<br />

mandatory subject of bargaining. 47 Thus, an employer may not<br />

unilaterally implement a drug screening or testing proposal for employees<br />

without prior bargaining with the union, and may not refuse to bargain<br />

over such a proposal. 48 In the Town of Fairhaven case, the LRC also held<br />

that a union could agree to a drug testing provision in a labor contract,<br />

and that by doing so the union was not waiving any employee<br />

constitutional rights (search and seizure, privacy, etc.) as long as the<br />

testing occurred when the employer had “probable cause” to test a<br />

particular employee. 49 The Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts has<br />

indicated, however, that random (i.e., without cause) drug testing without<br />

an individual’s consent violates the state constitution. 50<br />

Polygraph examinations are also treated like other testing procedures, but<br />

they present a special complication in that polygraph tests may only be<br />

given in the course of a criminal investigation. An employer may not even<br />

suggest that an employee submit to a polygraph exam as part of any<br />

hiring procedure or as a condition of continuing employment unless a<br />

criminal investigation is involved. 51 Where a police officer is under<br />

criminal investigation and is ordered to submit to a polygraph test, a<br />

police department was not required to bargain with the union prior to the<br />

test. 52<br />

Commonwealth of Massachusetts

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!