Management Rights - AELE's Home Page
Management Rights - AELE's Home Page
Management Rights - AELE's Home Page
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Employee Performance 17-4<br />
compelling interest in maintaining a qualified work force to justify the use<br />
of psychological tests. 40<br />
In addition to constitutional challenges, employees have challenged the<br />
use of psychological tests for particular purposes. Nonetheless, courts<br />
have upheld the use of psychological tests for applicants, 41 probationary<br />
employees, 42 employees exhibiting erratic behavior, 43 and random or<br />
periodic testing (without cause). 44 Moreover, an employee lawfully<br />
requested to perform a psychological evaluation may be disciplined if<br />
he/she or she refuses to submit to the exam. 45 Also, an employee may<br />
not insist on having a lawyer present during the exam. 46<br />
Typically, drug and alcohol testing is treated in a similar manner to<br />
psychological testing. Substance testing, according to the LRC, is a<br />
mandatory subject of bargaining. 47 Thus, an employer may not<br />
unilaterally implement a drug screening or testing proposal for employees<br />
without prior bargaining with the union, and may not refuse to bargain<br />
over such a proposal. 48 In the Town of Fairhaven case, the LRC also held<br />
that a union could agree to a drug testing provision in a labor contract,<br />
and that by doing so the union was not waiving any employee<br />
constitutional rights (search and seizure, privacy, etc.) as long as the<br />
testing occurred when the employer had “probable cause” to test a<br />
particular employee. 49 The Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts has<br />
indicated, however, that random (i.e., without cause) drug testing without<br />
an individual’s consent violates the state constitution. 50<br />
Polygraph examinations are also treated like other testing procedures, but<br />
they present a special complication in that polygraph tests may only be<br />
given in the course of a criminal investigation. An employer may not even<br />
suggest that an employee submit to a polygraph exam as part of any<br />
hiring procedure or as a condition of continuing employment unless a<br />
criminal investigation is involved. 51 Where a police officer is under<br />
criminal investigation and is ordered to submit to a polygraph test, a<br />
police department was not required to bargain with the union prior to the<br />
test. 52<br />
Commonwealth of Massachusetts