14.05.2015 Views

Management Rights - AELE's Home Page

Management Rights - AELE's Home Page

Management Rights - AELE's Home Page

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER 8 - BARGAINING<br />

UNIT WORK<br />

A public employer violates Section 10(a)(5) of the Law when it transfers<br />

work performed by bargaining unit members to non-bargaining unit<br />

personnel without giving its employees' exclusive collective bargaining<br />

representative prior notice and an opportunity to bargain to resolution or<br />

impasse. 1 To determine whether a department may contract out<br />

bargaining unit work, and whether there are bargaining obligations for<br />

doing so, one must look first to the language contained in the collective<br />

bargaining agreement itself. A public employer must bargain with the<br />

union before transferring work traditionally performed by bargaining unit<br />

employees to personnel outside the unit. 2 In order to prove that an<br />

employer unlawfully transferred work outside the bargaining unit, the<br />

union must show:<br />

1. the employer transferred unit work to non-unit personnel;<br />

2. the transfer of work had an adverse impact on either<br />

individual employees or on the bargaining unit itself; and<br />

3. the employer did not provide the union with prior notice of the<br />

decision to transfer the work and opportunity to bargain. 3<br />

The Commission has held consistently that a transfer of bargaining unit<br />

work, even if accompanied by no apparent reduction in bargaining unit<br />

positions, constitutes a detriment to the bargaining unit because it could<br />

result in an eventual elimination of the bargaining unit through gradual<br />

erosion of bargaining unit duties. 4 Similarly, the Commission has held<br />

consistently that losing the opportunity to perform unit work in the future<br />

is a sufficient detriment to the unit to trigger a bargaining obligation. 5 In<br />

a recent case, while the number of bargaining unit members may have<br />

remained the same, the bargaining unit lost a specialized position that<br />

was specifically enumerated in the collective bargaining agreement. 6<br />

Bargaining unit members therefore lost the opportunity to perform that<br />

position, and to earn the stipend associated with that position. These<br />

factors constitute an adverse impact that is sufficient to trigger the<br />

bargaining obligation. 7 The courts have supported these positions. 8 In a<br />

2004 Appeals Court case involving the State Department of Mental<br />

Retardation, the department transferred bargaining unit work from<br />

second-level residential supervisors to non-union program managers when<br />

it allowed managers to directly supervise first-level supervisors in new<br />

four-person group homes; the transfer of bargaining unit work constituted<br />

a detriment to the bargaining unit; and the Department failed to give<br />

Commonwealth of Massachusetts

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!