14.05.2015 Views

Management Rights - AELE's Home Page

Management Rights - AELE's Home Page

Management Rights - AELE's Home Page

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Reorganization 9-3<br />

to bargain, and, if requested, negotiate in good faith to agreement or<br />

impasse.<br />

§ 2 SUBSTANTIAL DETRIMENT<br />

The next issue to be addressed is whether the elimination of certain job<br />

duties from the bargaining unit causes it substantial detriment. 18<br />

A review of several LRC decisions will be helpful to illustrate the types of<br />

cases likely to result in adverse Commission rulings. No violation was<br />

found where the City of Boston hired traffic supervisors over the summer<br />

and expanded their duties to encompass issuing tickets and directing<br />

traffic at intersections. 19 Police officers normally performed that type of<br />

work. However, there was apparently enough work to go around. No<br />

officer lost overtime or was laid off and otherwise this work would not have<br />

been performed. The Commission concluded that there was no<br />

substantial detrimental impact on the police officer bargaining unit.<br />

In a case involving the decision to staff firehouses with call firefighters at<br />

night, rather than permanent full-time members of the union, the<br />

Commission found this to be an unlawful unilateral assignment of<br />

bargaining unit work. 20 If the night shifts had not been filled with call<br />

firefighters, the regulars would have been used (as contrasted with the<br />

Boston case above).<br />

While a decision simply to reduce the level of services is a managerial<br />

prerogative, the decision to transfer bargaining unit work previously<br />

performed by a security supervisor to employees outside of the bargaining<br />

unit, without giving the union prior notice and an opportunity to bargain,<br />

was held unlawful by the Commission. 21 Similarly, a Hearing officer<br />

found a violation where the employer transferred to the Executive Director<br />

the supervisory duties formerly performed by the position of maintenance<br />

foreman in a bargaining unit without first affording the union an<br />

opportunity to bargain over the decision. 22<br />

§ 3 SHARED WORK EXCEPTION<br />

The prohibition against unilaterally assigning work does not generally<br />

apply to "shared work" situations. 23 The work will not be recognized as<br />

exclusive bargaining unit work. 24 When work is performed by individuals<br />

both inside and outside of a complaining bargaining unit, the Commission<br />

will not require bargaining unless the union can show a "clear pattern" of<br />

assigning the work to bargaining unit members. 25 When work is shared<br />

by bargaining unit members and non-unit employees, the Commission<br />

has determined that the work will not be recognized as exclusively<br />

Massachusetts Municipal Police Training Committee

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!