14.05.2015 Views

Management Rights - AELE's Home Page

Management Rights - AELE's Home Page

Management Rights - AELE's Home Page

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Reorganization 9-2<br />

the work is supervisory in nature. 10 In the public sector, however,<br />

employers probably will only be successful if the duties to be transferred<br />

somehow qualify as managerial (not simply supervisory) in nature. 11<br />

Certainly this would not apply to dispatch duties.<br />

The Town of Halifax was guilty of unlawfully transferring bargaining unit<br />

work when it filled a full-time firefighter position with a temporary<br />

replacement firefighter who was not a bargaining unit member. 12<br />

Other examples of unlawful unilateral assignment of bargaining unit work<br />

to non-bargaining unit personnel include:<br />

assigning nursing duties to a special education<br />

paraprofessional 13<br />

assigning laborers’ work to prisoners and welfare recipients 14<br />

creating a new “working supervisor” with regular maintenance<br />

and custodial duties. 15<br />

The City of Fall River was held to have violated Section 5 and derivatively<br />

Section 1 of the Law by refusing to bargain in good faith with the union<br />

over the City's decision to transfer bargaining unit work<br />

(firefighter/dispatchers) to non-bargaining unit personnel (civilians, E-<br />

911, dispatchers located at the police station). 16 The LRC rejected the<br />

City's contention that this was a level of services decision and, therefore,<br />

an exclusive managerial prerogative exempt from decisional bargaining.<br />

The Commission declared the City's decision to transfer fire dispatch<br />

duties historically performed by bargaining unit members to non-unit<br />

personnel constitutes a mandatory subject of bargaining. The<br />

Commission noted that City employees would continue to perform fire<br />

dispatch duties, and when a public employer continues to have the same<br />

work performed, but at a lower cost, the decision to transfer bargaining<br />

unit work to non-unit personnel is not a level of services decision exempt<br />

from collective bargaining, but an economically motivated decision<br />

"particularly suitable to collective bargaining." 17<br />

PRACTICE POINTERS<br />

Municipalities considering transferring dispatch duties to a new E-911<br />

center should read City of Fall River carefully. It is likely that, with certain<br />

adjustments, the decision could amount to a level of services one and,<br />

therefore, be exempt from decisional bargaining. However, impact<br />

bargaining would still be required.<br />

Regardless of whether decisional or impact bargaining was involved, the<br />

employer would still need to provide the union with notice and opportunity<br />

Commonwealth of Massachusetts

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!