Management Rights - AELE's Home Page
Management Rights - AELE's Home Page
Management Rights - AELE's Home Page
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Reorganization 9-2<br />
the work is supervisory in nature. 10 In the public sector, however,<br />
employers probably will only be successful if the duties to be transferred<br />
somehow qualify as managerial (not simply supervisory) in nature. 11<br />
Certainly this would not apply to dispatch duties.<br />
The Town of Halifax was guilty of unlawfully transferring bargaining unit<br />
work when it filled a full-time firefighter position with a temporary<br />
replacement firefighter who was not a bargaining unit member. 12<br />
Other examples of unlawful unilateral assignment of bargaining unit work<br />
to non-bargaining unit personnel include:<br />
assigning nursing duties to a special education<br />
paraprofessional 13<br />
assigning laborers’ work to prisoners and welfare recipients 14<br />
creating a new “working supervisor” with regular maintenance<br />
and custodial duties. 15<br />
The City of Fall River was held to have violated Section 5 and derivatively<br />
Section 1 of the Law by refusing to bargain in good faith with the union<br />
over the City's decision to transfer bargaining unit work<br />
(firefighter/dispatchers) to non-bargaining unit personnel (civilians, E-<br />
911, dispatchers located at the police station). 16 The LRC rejected the<br />
City's contention that this was a level of services decision and, therefore,<br />
an exclusive managerial prerogative exempt from decisional bargaining.<br />
The Commission declared the City's decision to transfer fire dispatch<br />
duties historically performed by bargaining unit members to non-unit<br />
personnel constitutes a mandatory subject of bargaining. The<br />
Commission noted that City employees would continue to perform fire<br />
dispatch duties, and when a public employer continues to have the same<br />
work performed, but at a lower cost, the decision to transfer bargaining<br />
unit work to non-unit personnel is not a level of services decision exempt<br />
from collective bargaining, but an economically motivated decision<br />
"particularly suitable to collective bargaining." 17<br />
PRACTICE POINTERS<br />
Municipalities considering transferring dispatch duties to a new E-911<br />
center should read City of Fall River carefully. It is likely that, with certain<br />
adjustments, the decision could amount to a level of services one and,<br />
therefore, be exempt from decisional bargaining. However, impact<br />
bargaining would still be required.<br />
Regardless of whether decisional or impact bargaining was involved, the<br />
employer would still need to provide the union with notice and opportunity<br />
Commonwealth of Massachusetts