14.05.2015 Views

Management Rights - AELE's Home Page

Management Rights - AELE's Home Page

Management Rights - AELE's Home Page

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Workplace Rules and Practices 13-19<br />

are a mandatory subject of bargaining. 126 Furthermore, procedures for<br />

promotions affect an employee's condition of employment to a significant<br />

degree and are a mandatory subject of bargaining. 127<br />

In Lowell, the City's domestic violence policy contained new procedures<br />

and duties for reporting involvement in domestic violence, which were<br />

mandatory for the members of the bargaining unit. In addition, members<br />

of the bargaining unit who had committed or threatened to commit<br />

domestic violence would be disciplined for their acts. Moreover, under the<br />

policy, acts of domestic violence could be considered in promoting and<br />

making other work-related determination about members of the<br />

bargaining unit. Accordingly, the LRC concluded this domestic violence<br />

policy was a mandatory subject of bargaining.<br />

§ 16 RADIO PROCEDURES<br />

Section 6 of the Law requires a public employer and employee<br />

organization to negotiate in good faith with respect to wages, hours,<br />

standards of productivity and performance, and any other terms and<br />

conditions of employment. 128 According to the 2002 LRC case of Town of<br />

Andover, the radio procedure implemented by the Town was a mandatory<br />

subject of bargaining because it established standards of performance for<br />

patrol officers that were required as a condition of continued<br />

employment. 129 Therefore, the Town was obligated under the Law to give<br />

the Union notice and an opportunity to bargain before implementing the<br />

radio procedure. Because the Town refused to bargain over the radio<br />

procedure on demand by the Union, the LRC found that the Town violated<br />

the Law by unilaterally implementing a new radio procedure and by<br />

refusing to bargain on demand over a mandatory subject of bargaining.<br />

§ 17 PERSONAL CELL PHONES<br />

The Sheriff had the right to promulgate a rule banning personal cell<br />

phones on duty, even without providing the union with any opportunity to<br />

bargain over the decision or the impact of such new rule. 130 The<br />

Commission found that any interest the jail officers may have in carrying<br />

a personal cel phone on duty is outweighed the employer’s interest in<br />

maintaining public safety by ensuring that the jail officers are performing<br />

the necessary functions of providing care, custody and control of the jails<br />

inmates in a safe and attentive manner.<br />

Massachusetts Municipal Police Training Committee

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!