14.05.2015 Views

Management Rights - AELE's Home Page

Management Rights - AELE's Home Page

Management Rights - AELE's Home Page

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Management</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> 1-5<br />

Public policy, whether derived from, and<br />

whether explicit or implicit in statute or<br />

decisional law, or in neither, may . . . restrict the<br />

freedom to arbitrate. Susquehanna Valley Cent.<br />

School District at Conklin v. Susquehanna Valley<br />

Teachers Ass'n, 37 N.Y.2d 616-617, 376<br />

N.Y.S.2d 427, 429, 339 N.E.2d 132, 133 (1975). 5<br />

The Massachusetts courts have made it clear that -- even if agreement is<br />

reached and a provision is included in a contract -- there are certain<br />

matters of inherent managerial prerogative which cannot be bargained<br />

away. Therefore, a municipal employer is not bound by such provisions,<br />

even if they are inserted by agreement in a collective bargaining<br />

agreement. For example, in a case involving the Ayer Police Department,<br />

the appeals Court found that the decision to appoint police officers was a<br />

non-delegable managerial prerogative. 6<br />

There the contract required that the Selectmen reappoint police officers<br />

unless there was just cause found for not doing so. The court overturned<br />

the arbitration decision and stated:<br />

We need not decide whether the parties agreed<br />

to submit the question of [the police officer's<br />

reappointment] to arbitration . . . because, even<br />

if they did so agree, [the Board] would not be<br />

bound by an agreement to arbitrate its<br />

[reappointment] decision.<br />

Arguing that the Appeals Court holding in Ayer should be limited to<br />

departments organized under G.L. c. 41, § 96, a challenge was made<br />

concerning the actions of the Northborough Board of Selectmen (where<br />

G.L. c. 41, § 97A -- the “strong chief law” -- applied) to the Supreme<br />

Judicial Court. 7 There the Board voted not to reappoint an officer (union<br />

president) at the expiration of his term of appointment. The court found<br />

no logic for any distinction focusing on the statutory basis under which a<br />

department is organized. It reiterated the reasoning of the Ayer decision<br />

and stated:<br />

A town may not by agreement abandon a<br />

nondelegable right of management. Billerica v.<br />

International Ass'n of Firefighters, Local 1495,<br />

415 Mass. 692, 694 (1993). Therefore, even if<br />

the arbitration clause in the present case could<br />

be interpreted to grant an arbitrator the right to<br />

decide whether a police officer is entitled to<br />

reappointment, such an agreement would be<br />

unlawful and unenforceable. "[A]n agreement to<br />

Massachusetts Municipal Police Training Committee

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!