Management Rights - AELE's Home Page
Management Rights - AELE's Home Page
Management Rights - AELE's Home Page
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Management</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> 1-5<br />
Public policy, whether derived from, and<br />
whether explicit or implicit in statute or<br />
decisional law, or in neither, may . . . restrict the<br />
freedom to arbitrate. Susquehanna Valley Cent.<br />
School District at Conklin v. Susquehanna Valley<br />
Teachers Ass'n, 37 N.Y.2d 616-617, 376<br />
N.Y.S.2d 427, 429, 339 N.E.2d 132, 133 (1975). 5<br />
The Massachusetts courts have made it clear that -- even if agreement is<br />
reached and a provision is included in a contract -- there are certain<br />
matters of inherent managerial prerogative which cannot be bargained<br />
away. Therefore, a municipal employer is not bound by such provisions,<br />
even if they are inserted by agreement in a collective bargaining<br />
agreement. For example, in a case involving the Ayer Police Department,<br />
the appeals Court found that the decision to appoint police officers was a<br />
non-delegable managerial prerogative. 6<br />
There the contract required that the Selectmen reappoint police officers<br />
unless there was just cause found for not doing so. The court overturned<br />
the arbitration decision and stated:<br />
We need not decide whether the parties agreed<br />
to submit the question of [the police officer's<br />
reappointment] to arbitration . . . because, even<br />
if they did so agree, [the Board] would not be<br />
bound by an agreement to arbitrate its<br />
[reappointment] decision.<br />
Arguing that the Appeals Court holding in Ayer should be limited to<br />
departments organized under G.L. c. 41, § 96, a challenge was made<br />
concerning the actions of the Northborough Board of Selectmen (where<br />
G.L. c. 41, § 97A -- the “strong chief law” -- applied) to the Supreme<br />
Judicial Court. 7 There the Board voted not to reappoint an officer (union<br />
president) at the expiration of his term of appointment. The court found<br />
no logic for any distinction focusing on the statutory basis under which a<br />
department is organized. It reiterated the reasoning of the Ayer decision<br />
and stated:<br />
A town may not by agreement abandon a<br />
nondelegable right of management. Billerica v.<br />
International Ass'n of Firefighters, Local 1495,<br />
415 Mass. 692, 694 (1993). Therefore, even if<br />
the arbitration clause in the present case could<br />
be interpreted to grant an arbitrator the right to<br />
decide whether a police officer is entitled to<br />
reappointment, such an agreement would be<br />
unlawful and unenforceable. "[A]n agreement to<br />
Massachusetts Municipal Police Training Committee