14.05.2015 Views

Management Rights - AELE's Home Page

Management Rights - AELE's Home Page

Management Rights - AELE's Home Page

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Appointments 7-4<br />

In both Boston School Committee, 23 and Town of Lee, 24 the LRC upheld the<br />

imposition of a residency requirement on all new hires as a condition of<br />

hire. As a condition of hire, it only pertained to applicants who, as<br />

potential or prospective employees, are not members of the bargaining<br />

unit. Similarly, in Star Tribune, 25 the National Labor Relations Board<br />

(NLRB) held that requiring drug and alcohol tests of all applicants was<br />

outside the scope of bargaining. In City of Haverhill, 26 the LRC held that<br />

an employer could impose a qualification that all applicants undergo a<br />

psychological exam as a condition of being hired. In each of these cases,<br />

the key inquiry was whether or not the qualification was imposed on<br />

applicants or employees; so long as the qualification only affected<br />

applicants, they were upheld.<br />

PRACTICE POINTERS<br />

While the distinction between applicant and employee seems clear, there is<br />

one nuance of which employers should be aware. Any qualifications or<br />

conditions of hire must be imposed and decided before the person is hired,<br />

even if only conditionally.<br />

While whether a person meets the qualifications such as college degrees,<br />

CPR training, etc., can be decided immediately, some qualifications often<br />

take longer to consider. Where such a delay occurs, and the employer<br />

chooses to conditionally-hire the applicant, permitting the person to work<br />

pending the confirmation of a qualification, the LRC will likely consider the<br />

person an “employee” and require the employer to bargain over that<br />

qualification. Psychological testing which was not given until after an<br />

employee started work is such an example. 27 Where the results are not<br />

known or the test is not even administered until after the person was put<br />

to work, the qualification actually becomes a condition of continued<br />

“employment”, not a condition of “hire”.<br />

Attention should also be paid to the requirements of various federal and<br />

state anti-discrimination laws. For example, the Americans With<br />

Disabilities Act (ADA) (and presumably G.L. c.151B) precludes medical and<br />

psychological illness testing until a conditional offer of employment is<br />

made.<br />

§ 2 ENTRY-LEVEL WAGES<br />

Unlike establishing qualifications for applicants, establishing wages for<br />

entry-level employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining. 28 Wages,<br />

because they are earned after an applicant becomes an employee and a<br />

member of the bargaining unit, must be negotiated if the union so<br />

requests. 29 An employer may not unilaterally decrease or increase the<br />

Commonwealth of Massachusetts

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!