18.11.2012 Views

Plutonium Biokinetics in Human Body A. Luciani - Kit-Bibliothek - FZK

Plutonium Biokinetics in Human Body A. Luciani - Kit-Bibliothek - FZK

Plutonium Biokinetics in Human Body A. Luciani - Kit-Bibliothek - FZK

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 3.1.20 Exponents and coefficients of analytical functions for the ur<strong>in</strong>ary excretion rate<br />

of <strong>Plutonium</strong> after <strong>in</strong>gestion (Model-b ).<br />

Index i f 1 = 5•10 -4<br />

1 4.77•10 -6<br />

2 3.06•10 -7<br />

3 5.63•10 -8<br />

4 -4.18•10 -9<br />

5 8.55•10 -9<br />

6 9.06•10 -8<br />

7 -8.24•10 -8<br />

121<br />

f 1 = 1•10 -4<br />

f 1 = 1•10 -5<br />

c i λ i[d -1 ] c i λ i[d -1 ] c i λ i[d -1 ]<br />

7.5•10 -1<br />

9.5•10 -2<br />

8.2•10 -3<br />

1.2•10 -3<br />

8•10 -4<br />

1•10 -5<br />

8•10 -6<br />

9.54•10 -7<br />

6.12•10 -£<br />

1.13•10 -8<br />

-8.36•10 -10<br />

1.71•10 -9<br />

1.81•10 -8<br />

-1.65•10 -8<br />

7.5•10 -1<br />

9.5•10 -2<br />

8.2•10 -3<br />

1.2•10 -3<br />

8•10 -4<br />

1•10 -5<br />

8•10 -6<br />

9.54•10 -8<br />

6.12•10 -9<br />

1.13•10 -9<br />

-8.36•10 -11<br />

1.71•10 -10<br />

1.81•10 -9<br />

-1.65•10 -9<br />

7.5•10 -1<br />

9.5•10 -2<br />

8.2•10 -3<br />

1.2•10 -3<br />

8•10 -4<br />

1•10 -5<br />

8•10 -6<br />

For an <strong>in</strong>take via <strong>in</strong>halation the exponents of the first three terms describ<strong>in</strong>g the shortterm<br />

excretion are equal under all the conditions of exposure. The exponents of the last four<br />

terms depend on the type of absorption, but turn out to be almost <strong>in</strong>dependent on the AMAD<br />

of the aerosol. The exponential expression deviates from the exact analytical solution of the<br />

model by less than 5% for the first 10 days post-<strong>in</strong>take and less than 2% up to 20,000 days<br />

post-<strong>in</strong>take. In case of <strong>in</strong>gestion it was possible to obta<strong>in</strong> reasonably good fitt<strong>in</strong>g us<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

same exponents for all the standard f 1 values. The coefficients of the exponential terms were<br />

firstly calculated for the analytical function of the <strong>Plutonium</strong> ur<strong>in</strong>ary excretion relat<strong>in</strong>g to f 1 =<br />

5•10 -4 . The same coefficients can be used for the analytical functions relat<strong>in</strong>g to the other two<br />

f 1 values (1•10 -4 and 1•10 -5 ). In the latter cases the coefficients for f 1 = 5•10 -4 should be<br />

multiplied by factors derived from the f 1 values (1•10 -4 /5•10 -4 = 0.2 and 1•10 -5 /5•10 -4 = 0.02).<br />

Even with this extreme simplification the exponential expression deviates from the exact<br />

analytical solution of the model by less than 15% for the first 10 days post-<strong>in</strong>take and less<br />

than 10% up to 20,000 days post-<strong>in</strong>take.<br />

3.1.5.3 Sensitivity analysis<br />

A sensitivity analysis was applied to the opimized model <strong>in</strong> order to pick out the most<br />

significant parameters for the ur<strong>in</strong>ary excretion of <strong>Plutonium</strong>. To a lesser extent fecal<br />

excretion and activity <strong>in</strong> blood were also considered. Respiratory tract and gastro<strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>al<br />

compartmental models connected to the systemic model were considered as well, and the<br />

sensitivity analysis was applied to their parameters too, <strong>in</strong> order to consider real cases of<br />

contam<strong>in</strong>ation via <strong>in</strong>gestion or <strong>in</strong>halation. The results of the present sensitivity analysis have<br />

two ma<strong>in</strong> applications. First of all it allows to identify the transfer rates and <strong>in</strong> a certa<strong>in</strong> way<br />

the physiological processes whose alteration could expla<strong>in</strong> possible significant deviations of<br />

the measurements of the excreted activity from the model predictions. Secondly they will be<br />

used as a screen<strong>in</strong>g method to reduce the number of model parameters that must be<br />

considered <strong>in</strong> the subsequent analysis of the uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty of the model predictions for<br />

<strong>Plutonium</strong> excretion <strong>in</strong> ur<strong>in</strong>e. As usual great importance was placed on the ur<strong>in</strong>ary excretion<br />

of <strong>Plutonium</strong> because the monitor<strong>in</strong>g of the <strong>in</strong>ternal contam<strong>in</strong>ation follow<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>take of a<br />

Pu-radioisotope is ma<strong>in</strong>ly based on measurements of activity <strong>in</strong> biological samples, more

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!