Plutonium Biokinetics in Human Body A. Luciani - Kit-Bibliothek - FZK
Plutonium Biokinetics in Human Body A. Luciani - Kit-Bibliothek - FZK
Plutonium Biokinetics in Human Body A. Luciani - Kit-Bibliothek - FZK
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
the m<strong>in</strong>imum detectable activity of the adopted measur<strong>in</strong>g technique because of difficulties <strong>in</strong><br />
fitt<strong>in</strong>g model with values “less than” a certa<strong>in</strong> quantity. The contam<strong>in</strong>ation event should be<br />
characterized by a unique path of <strong>in</strong>take because of the difficulties <strong>in</strong> evaluat<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
contributions to the ur<strong>in</strong>ary excretion from different <strong>in</strong>take patterns. Furthermore the time<br />
modality of <strong>in</strong>take should be acute or approximately analogous <strong>in</strong> order to avoid the<br />
uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty due to hardly verifiable hypothesis on constant rates of <strong>in</strong>take, or times of<br />
repetitive s<strong>in</strong>gles <strong>in</strong>takes. F<strong>in</strong>ally patients subjected to chelat<strong>in</strong>g therapy (as with DTPA)<br />
should be avoided too because of the enhancement of <strong>Plutonium</strong> ur<strong>in</strong>ary excretion observed<br />
<strong>in</strong> such subjects.<br />
Comply<strong>in</strong>g the aforementioned conditions n<strong>in</strong>e contam<strong>in</strong>ation cases were extracted<br />
from the Manhattan Project Workers and United States Transuranium and Uranium Registries<br />
data sets. In Table 2.1.1 they are shortly presented, together with the number of ur<strong>in</strong>e samples<br />
suitable for check<strong>in</strong>g model’s predictions of ur<strong>in</strong>ary excretion. In fact <strong>in</strong> the present work for<br />
each considered subject those ur<strong>in</strong>e samples collected and analyzed before 1957 were<br />
disregarded because only after this year corrections were systematically determ<strong>in</strong>ed and<br />
applied for chemical and physical analysis [121]. As for all the selected cases the most<br />
significant <strong>in</strong>takes occurred <strong>in</strong> the period 1945-1946 and <strong>in</strong> any case before 1950, the long<br />
period between the <strong>in</strong>take and the chosen measurements assures also that the same<br />
measurements are not significantly <strong>in</strong>fluenced by the actual time modalities of <strong>in</strong>take.<br />
Therefore these cases of contam<strong>in</strong>ation can be reasonably considered as due to an acute<br />
<strong>in</strong>take.<br />
Table 2.1.1 Occupational contam<strong>in</strong>ation cases selected from Manhattan Project Workers<br />
(MPW) and United States Transuranium and Uranium Registries (USTUR) data<br />
sets.<br />
Subject’s<br />
code<br />
Data set Birth year Number of useful<br />
samples of Pu ur<strong>in</strong>ary<br />
excretion<br />
242 USTUR 1909 107<br />
193* USTUR 1920 105<br />
4 MPW 1919 105<br />
208 USTUR 1915 64<br />
25 MPW 1918 21<br />
10 MPW 1912 21<br />
18 MPW 1922 20<br />
7 MPW 1907 10<br />
21 MPW 1924 8<br />
* it is also present <strong>in</strong> MPW under the code “27”.<br />
42