18.11.2012 Views

Plutonium Biokinetics in Human Body A. Luciani - Kit-Bibliothek - FZK

Plutonium Biokinetics in Human Body A. Luciani - Kit-Bibliothek - FZK

Plutonium Biokinetics in Human Body A. Luciani - Kit-Bibliothek - FZK

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

the m<strong>in</strong>imum detectable activity of the adopted measur<strong>in</strong>g technique because of difficulties <strong>in</strong><br />

fitt<strong>in</strong>g model with values “less than” a certa<strong>in</strong> quantity. The contam<strong>in</strong>ation event should be<br />

characterized by a unique path of <strong>in</strong>take because of the difficulties <strong>in</strong> evaluat<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

contributions to the ur<strong>in</strong>ary excretion from different <strong>in</strong>take patterns. Furthermore the time<br />

modality of <strong>in</strong>take should be acute or approximately analogous <strong>in</strong> order to avoid the<br />

uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty due to hardly verifiable hypothesis on constant rates of <strong>in</strong>take, or times of<br />

repetitive s<strong>in</strong>gles <strong>in</strong>takes. F<strong>in</strong>ally patients subjected to chelat<strong>in</strong>g therapy (as with DTPA)<br />

should be avoided too because of the enhancement of <strong>Plutonium</strong> ur<strong>in</strong>ary excretion observed<br />

<strong>in</strong> such subjects.<br />

Comply<strong>in</strong>g the aforementioned conditions n<strong>in</strong>e contam<strong>in</strong>ation cases were extracted<br />

from the Manhattan Project Workers and United States Transuranium and Uranium Registries<br />

data sets. In Table 2.1.1 they are shortly presented, together with the number of ur<strong>in</strong>e samples<br />

suitable for check<strong>in</strong>g model’s predictions of ur<strong>in</strong>ary excretion. In fact <strong>in</strong> the present work for<br />

each considered subject those ur<strong>in</strong>e samples collected and analyzed before 1957 were<br />

disregarded because only after this year corrections were systematically determ<strong>in</strong>ed and<br />

applied for chemical and physical analysis [121]. As for all the selected cases the most<br />

significant <strong>in</strong>takes occurred <strong>in</strong> the period 1945-1946 and <strong>in</strong> any case before 1950, the long<br />

period between the <strong>in</strong>take and the chosen measurements assures also that the same<br />

measurements are not significantly <strong>in</strong>fluenced by the actual time modalities of <strong>in</strong>take.<br />

Therefore these cases of contam<strong>in</strong>ation can be reasonably considered as due to an acute<br />

<strong>in</strong>take.<br />

Table 2.1.1 Occupational contam<strong>in</strong>ation cases selected from Manhattan Project Workers<br />

(MPW) and United States Transuranium and Uranium Registries (USTUR) data<br />

sets.<br />

Subject’s<br />

code<br />

Data set Birth year Number of useful<br />

samples of Pu ur<strong>in</strong>ary<br />

excretion<br />

242 USTUR 1909 107<br />

193* USTUR 1920 105<br />

4 MPW 1919 105<br />

208 USTUR 1915 64<br />

25 MPW 1918 21<br />

10 MPW 1912 21<br />

18 MPW 1922 20<br />

7 MPW 1907 10<br />

21 MPW 1924 8<br />

* it is also present <strong>in</strong> MPW under the code “27”.<br />

42

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!