18.11.2012 Views

Plutonium Biokinetics in Human Body A. Luciani - Kit-Bibliothek - FZK

Plutonium Biokinetics in Human Body A. Luciani - Kit-Bibliothek - FZK

Plutonium Biokinetics in Human Body A. Luciani - Kit-Bibliothek - FZK

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2.2 A DESCRIPTION OF THE UPDATED CONTAMINATION CASE<br />

The contam<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>in</strong>cident <strong>in</strong>vestigated <strong>in</strong> the present work is one of the best<br />

documented cases of a s<strong>in</strong>gle <strong>in</strong>take of transuranium elements worldwide ( 238 Pu, 239 Pu, 240 Pu,<br />

241 Pu, and 241 Am). This contam<strong>in</strong>ation case complies quite well the requirements previously<br />

described for us<strong>in</strong>g a data set of occupational exposure for model verification purposes.<br />

Furthermore it shows two important aspects:<br />

• The measurements carried out <strong>in</strong> recent years <strong>in</strong> occasion of dose assessments<br />

<strong>in</strong>tercomparisons showed a significant enhancement of <strong>Plutonium</strong> ur<strong>in</strong>ary excretion,<br />

particularly at long time after contam<strong>in</strong>ation. This was already po<strong>in</strong>ted out, but at a lesser<br />

extent, <strong>in</strong> other contam<strong>in</strong>ated subjects [122];<br />

• The <strong>Plutonium</strong> mixture <strong>in</strong>troduced by the subject conta<strong>in</strong>s 241 Am too, giv<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

possibility of carry<strong>in</strong>g out direct measurements of organs activity burden, otherwise<br />

hardly detectable <strong>in</strong> case of a contam<strong>in</strong>ation of pure <strong>Plutonium</strong>.<br />

For such characteristics it was already proposed as a case study <strong>in</strong> different<br />

<strong>in</strong>tercomparisons on dose assessment. It is present as “Case 8” <strong>in</strong> the IAEA <strong>in</strong>tercomparison<br />

[123] and it is the base for “Case 6” <strong>in</strong> the 3 rd European <strong>in</strong>tercomparison [124]. At the time of<br />

the <strong>in</strong>tercomparisons there was already a set of excretion and organ burden data from the first<br />

day after the <strong>in</strong>take up to almost ten years [125]. S<strong>in</strong>ce 1983 direct measurements of<br />

Americium burden <strong>in</strong> different organs were carried out also <strong>in</strong> Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe<br />

[126]. In the frame of the present work <strong>in</strong> 1999 a complete follow-up of this case was carried<br />

out <strong>in</strong> Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe and new data for the <strong>Plutonium</strong> and Americium amounts<br />

<strong>in</strong> bioassays (ur<strong>in</strong>e, feces and blood) and for the Americium organs burdens were obta<strong>in</strong>ed.<br />

The results of these direct and <strong>in</strong>direct measurements are extensively presented <strong>in</strong> the two<br />

paragraphs 2.3.3 and 2.4.3, respectively.<br />

2.2.1 THE CONTAMINATION EVENT<br />

The work<strong>in</strong>g area where the contam<strong>in</strong>ation event occurred was a radiochemical<br />

laboratory for the development of advanced nuclear fuel <strong>in</strong> a nuclear research centre. In the<br />

laboratory nuclear fuels microspheres had been produced <strong>in</strong> a glove box us<strong>in</strong>g a special<br />

gell<strong>in</strong>g technique. The waste water result<strong>in</strong>g from this technique was rout<strong>in</strong>eously collected<br />

and evaporated <strong>in</strong> the box. The residual waste water deriv<strong>in</strong>g from this process was<br />

transferred <strong>in</strong>to a second glove box for further evaporation and successive disposal.<br />

The subject (male, 26 years old at that time, 91 kg weight, 179 cm height) was<br />

work<strong>in</strong>g at the first glove box where the fuel microspehre were produced. On 24.05.83 at 4:15<br />

PM an explosion occurred <strong>in</strong> the second glove box dur<strong>in</strong>g the evaporation of three litres waste<br />

water as a consequence of a unexpected exothermic reaction. The subject left the laboratory<br />

immediately after the explosion, yet he resulted strongly contam<strong>in</strong>ated at face, hairs and<br />

clothes. He was immediately decontam<strong>in</strong>ated <strong>in</strong> the radiation protection unit of the research<br />

centre and nose swabs with bronchial slime samples were collected.<br />

In the glove boxes the wash<strong>in</strong>g water conta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>Plutonium</strong> and Uranium <strong>in</strong> a mixture<br />

of hydroxide gel with 10 % of ammonium nitrate and about 3.5 % of hexamethylentetram<strong>in</strong>e.<br />

The α activity composition of the substance caus<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>ternal contam<strong>in</strong>ation of the subject<br />

was 9 % 238 Pu, 55 % 239 Pu, 26% 240 Pu and 10 % 241 Am. The 241 Pu activity was 750 % of the<br />

total α activity. Size distribution analysis of dust samples collected <strong>in</strong> the laboratory was also<br />

carried out by means of scann<strong>in</strong>g electron microscope exposures and x ray analyses. The<br />

diameter of the particles conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>Plutonium</strong> resulted to be between 3 and 40 µm.<br />

43

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!