18.11.2012 Views

Plutonium Biokinetics in Human Body A. Luciani - Kit-Bibliothek - FZK

Plutonium Biokinetics in Human Body A. Luciani - Kit-Bibliothek - FZK

Plutonium Biokinetics in Human Body A. Luciani - Kit-Bibliothek - FZK

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

excretion at long time (after 2,000 days post <strong>in</strong>take) predicted by the model still<br />

underestimates the experimental results. In this time range the subject’s excretion is<br />

characterized by the enhancement that made this case a particularly <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g contam<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

event.<br />

The Americium burden <strong>in</strong> lungs at long time, due to the 241 Pu decay, overestimates the<br />

experimental f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> the scenario 1 (up to a factor 4) and underestimates them <strong>in</strong> the<br />

scenario 3 (by about a factor 12). Therefore such fraction of Americium seems to behave <strong>in</strong><br />

the respiratory tract with an absorption type rang<strong>in</strong>g from the type S (the absorption type for<br />

the father <strong>Plutonium</strong> <strong>in</strong> the scenario 1) and the type M (the reference absorption type for<br />

Americium adopted <strong>in</strong> the scenario 3). In order to improve model’s predictions of Americium<br />

lung retention, the absorption parameter determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the Americium retention <strong>in</strong> lungs at long<br />

time (s t) was varied <strong>in</strong> the range from 0.0001 d -1 (the reference value for absorption type S) to<br />

0.005 d -1 (the reference value for absorption type M). It was found that model’s predictions<br />

for the Americium burden <strong>in</strong> lungs significantly improve their agreement with the<br />

experimental f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs at long time if a value 0.001 d -1 is assumed for s t (Figure 3.2.7). The<br />

other absorption parameters (s p and s pt) were set to the default values for the absorption type<br />

S.<br />

Such modification may have a reasonable physiological explanation:<br />

• The Americium just formed after <strong>Plutonium</strong> decay behaves at short time <strong>in</strong> the respiratory<br />

tract as the father (<strong>Plutonium</strong> default values of s p and s pt for the absorption type S are<br />

therefore assumed);<br />

• At longer time Americium own specific metabolic characteristics gets more and more<br />

evident (therefore the value of s t has reasonably a value between the default values for S<br />

and M absorption types).<br />

Therefore such approach can be considered more realistic <strong>in</strong> comparison to the<br />

assumption of an Americium <strong>in</strong>growth with all the same absorption parameters of the father<br />

<strong>Plutonium</strong> (as usually assumed by ICRP and here <strong>in</strong> the scenario 1) or with its own default<br />

absorption characteristics (as <strong>in</strong> case of a direct <strong>in</strong>halation).<br />

On the basis of the previous assumed value of s t for Americium <strong>in</strong>growth from 241 Pu<br />

decay, the <strong>in</strong>take of 241 Am directly <strong>in</strong>haled was evaluated as 9 kBq. The <strong>in</strong>takes of all the<br />

other <strong>in</strong>volved radionuclides are easily evaluated by means of the their ratio at the moment of<br />

the <strong>in</strong>take. The relat<strong>in</strong>g value of the F target function calculated on lung measurements is 50%<br />

and 1% of the value calculated <strong>in</strong> case of the scenarios 1 and 3 respectively. This<br />

quantitatively po<strong>in</strong>ts out the improvement of the model’s predictions of Americium lung<br />

retention when the absorption parameters are changed accord<strong>in</strong>g to the previous assumptions.<br />

The model’s predictions for the ur<strong>in</strong>ary excretion of <strong>Plutonium</strong> are equal to those ones<br />

evaluated <strong>in</strong> case of the scenario 1 (Figure 3.2.4) because only the default s t absorption<br />

parameter for Americium <strong>in</strong>growth was modified and no parameter relat<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>Plutonium</strong> was<br />

modified.<br />

Model’s predictions for the lymph nodes burden of Americium were compared to few<br />

available measurements too and a good agreement was found even for this set of data.<br />

At conclusion of the analysis of the most reliable measurements for modell<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

test<strong>in</strong>g purposes, a good agreement of model’s predictions with the experimental data was<br />

obta<strong>in</strong>ed. Furthermore the considered modification (the change of the s t absorption parameter<br />

for Americium <strong>in</strong>growth from <strong>Plutonium</strong> decay) seems to be reasonably acceptable from a<br />

physiological po<strong>in</strong>t of view too. However the enhancement of <strong>Plutonium</strong> ur<strong>in</strong>ary excretion at<br />

144

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!