10.07.2015 Views

By Evarist Baimu Nyaga Mawalla - Home

By Evarist Baimu Nyaga Mawalla - Home

By Evarist Baimu Nyaga Mawalla - Home

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Secretary wrote to the appellant Annex D in which he sought to replace thecontents of the letter of 24 may 1991. <strong>By</strong> this date the appellant had alreadyinitiated proceedings in CourtWe feel that this matter could have been attended to in a more expeditiousmanner and could have been handled more carefully considering that it involvedthe very livelihood of a public official and a very senior official at that a judge ofthe High Court we can only express our hope that in future the strict letter of theconstitution and the law will be followed and that matters of that sort will behandle more diligently.That not withstanding the appeal is dismissed the preliminary objection wasproperly upheld and the application by the appellant was rightly struck our.Further, the cross-appeal is allowed to the `extent that the appellants is no longera person in the .. of the united Republic for 13 th My 1991 but that he is tohave his pension with effect from that date we make not order as to costs It is soorderedDATE ARUSHA THIS 25 TH day of October 1993A.S.L. RAMADHANIJUSTICE OF APPEAL392

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!