10.07.2015 Views

By Evarist Baimu Nyaga Mawalla - Home

By Evarist Baimu Nyaga Mawalla - Home

By Evarist Baimu Nyaga Mawalla - Home

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIAAT DAR ES SALAAMMISC. CIVIL CASE NO. 141/94N.M.C. APPLICANTVERSUSHAMISI JUMA & 90 OTHERS 1 ST RESPONDENTRULINGMACKANJA J.We can safely say that the respondents were until the 31 day of December,1984, employees of the applicant. And it is now common knowledge that theywere found to constitute labour suplusage in consequence of which they wereretrenched. It is also beyond controversy that they kept quiet after theredundancy they complain of was effected until the 24 th day of February, 1992,when they lodged their complaint before the labour commissioner. There wastherefore a period of eight years which separaters the two events. They were atthat time being advocated for by the Legal Aid Committee of the Faculty of Lawof the University of Dar es Salaam. Their grievances were forwarded to theMinister responsible for labour (the minister) who gave the green light to theIndustrial Court to inquire into the trade dispute. An inquiry was indeedconducted and a report, as per law, was made available to the minister. Upon thereasons he gave the minister decided to order the re-instatement of the 91511

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!