By Evarist Baimu Nyaga Mawalla - Home

case. In entertaining these applications by ten application this court has usurpedme powers. This court has had powers to entertain such application for ages see,Northern Tanzania Farmers Cooperative Socety v. W. H Shellukino (1987)No. 36This court creature of statue in entertaining such applications performs for thebenefit of the people. As was stated by Brett, LL,J, R.V Local Government Board(Board 1882)to QBD 306 at 321 that:Wherever the legislature entrusts to any/bed of persons other than its superiorcourts the powers of imposing an obligation upon individuals the courts ought toexercise as widely as they can the power of controlling those bodiesIf they attempted to-exceed their statutory powers it is one of high courts dutiesto exercise supervisory powers on bodies other than a superior court that areentrusted by parliament to take decision that affect the nights of the people topensure that these bodies perform with the limits set to them by the ParliamentThis ensures consistent of location of the countryentrenched principles offreedom and justicesto the Government ageists the Parliaments decisionencores avoidance of the this Republic duties being executive on people whomwhere people are reduced to numbers w. but any personal regard to hardship ofthe very people said by the officials to be serving These supervisory powersensures existence of tangible values like justice, truth consistory within whichare embedded elements such as compassion and dedication. He grant by theParliament of these supervisory powers ensured expediency or might is right430