pobierz - WydziaÅ Nauk Ekonomicznych SGGW w Warszawie

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Concerning the cost efficiency it can be stated that the highest cost efficiency(without subsidies) for 1 € invested into the production was recorded in 1996 (1.25 €). Thelowest cost efficiency for 1 € invested into the production was reached in 2009 (0.61 €).Table 3 indicates the efficiency of sunflower subsidies within given years. Theresults show that the highest share of subsidies on settlement costs was recorded in 2004(23.74%) and the lowest one in 1996 (9.5%). The subsidies per hectare of growingsunflower reached the lowest value in 1996 (38.17 €.ha -1 ) and the highest one in 2007(172.77 €.ha -1 ). Obtained results clearly indicate that the entrance of Slovakia into theEU (2004) increased considerably sunflower subsidies.Tab 3 Efficiency analysis of sunflower subsidies in Slovakia according to yearsShare of subsidiesSubsidies SubsidiesYearv €.t -1v €.ha -1 on settlementcosts in %Share ofsubsidies onsales in %1996 18.82 38.17 9.50 7.592004 65.46 156.48 23.74 27.412005 63.87 148.14 22.46 27.042006 55.20 122.52 17.86 23.122007 76.11 172.77 21.48 20.322008 48.36 137.82 15.90 18.792009 61.57 154.58 18.93 31.06Index 09/96 - 4.05 1.99 -Source: Prime costs and economy results of agricultural companies in the SlovakRepublic in 1996, 2004 – 2009 VÚEPP Bratislava, own calculations.Break-event points of sunflower yield are evaluated in Table 4. The break-eventpoint expresses economic situation when all costs are covered and there is neither profitnor loss. The bigger amount of production is achieved above the break-event point, thebigger profit is gained in the evaluated year. Moreover, this year is less influenced byrisk factors such as the change of exercise price within the sale. The bigger amount ofproduction is achieved below the break-event point, the bigger loss is recorded inrelation to the sunflower production within the evaluated year.The biggest difference in calculated break-event point of sunflower yield(without subsidies) was reached in 2009 (-1.61 t.ha -1 ). This means that if the sunfloweryield increased by 1.61 t.ha -1 , the costs of growing of sunflower would be equal to sales.Economically most advantageous years of growing of sunflower were years 1996 and2007 when the growing of sunflower was profitable also without the implementation ofany subsidies. The growing of sunflower was loss-making even with the implementationof subsidies in 2006 and 2009. The production of sunflower was profitable with theimplementation of subsidies in 2004, 2005 and 2008.The data in Table 4 indicate the need for the intensification of production. Thiscan be done mainly by implementing positive experience and results of successfulproducers who reach the yield 2.6 - 3 t.ha -1 and more. The profitability of growing ofsunflower was influenced by the following important factors: hectare yields, prime costs,subsidies and exercise prices.135
Tab 4 Break-event points of sunflower yield in Slovakia according to yearsIndicatorYears1996 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Yield in t.ha -1 2.03 2.39 2.32 2.22 2.27 2.85 2.51Break-event point in t.ha -1 1 1.62 2.76 2.79 2.87 2.15 3.37 4.122 1.47 2.11 2.17 2.36 1.69 2.83 3.34Difference in t.ha -1 1 0.41 - 0.37 - 0.47 - 0.51 0.12 - 0.52 - 1.612 0.56 0.28 0.15 - 0.14 0.58 0.02 - 0.83Profit (loss) in €.ha -1 1 101.37 - 88.73 - 111.66 - 156.01 46.17 - 133.14 - 318.962 139.55 68.05 36.47 - 33.49 218.95 4.68 - 164.37Source: Prime costs and economy results of agricultural companies in the SlovakRepublic in 1996, 2004 – 2009 VÚEPP Bratislava, own calculations.Note: 1 – without subsidies, 2 – with subsidiesUpcoming yields will be significantly influenced by climate changes (increaseof average temperatures together with the reduction of rainfall). This fact has alreadybeen recorded in the last years. Therefore, the agricultural companies will have to focuson the selection of appropriate forecrop and to respect the growing procedure within theproduction. They will also have to pay attention to the consequent soil preparation, dateand density of sowing and to the provision of optimal protection and nutrition which isthe task of the management of agricultural company.REFERENCESBurianová, V. 2010. Náklady a výnosy poľnohospodárskych výrobkov v SR za rok 2009.Bratislava: VÚEPP, 2010. ISBN 978-80-8058-551-8.Kubanková, M. - Burianová, V. 2009. Náklady a výnosy poľnohospodárskych výrobkovv SR za rok 2008. Bratislava: VÚEPP, 2009. ISBN 978-80-8058-525-9.Kubanková, M. - Burianová, V. 2008. Náklady a výnosy poľnohospodárskych výrobkovv SR za rok 2007. Bratislava: VÚEPP, 2008. ISBN 978-80-8058-492-4.Kubanková, M. - Burianová, V. 2007. Náklady a výnosy poľnohospodárskych výrobkovv SR za rok 2006. Bratislava: VÚEPP, 2007. ISBN 978-80-8058-525-9.Kubanková, M. - Burianová, V. 2006. Náklady a výnosy poľnohospodárskych výrobkovv SR za rok 2005. Bratislava: VÚEPP, 2006. ISBN 80-8058-444-3.Kubanková, M. - Burianová, V. 2005. Náklady a výnosy poľnohospodárskych výrobkovv SR za rok 2004. Bratislava: VÚEPP, 2005. ISBN 80-8058-381-1.Kubanková, M. - Burianová, V. 1997. Náklady a výnosy poľnohospodárskych výrobkovv SR za rok 1996. Bratislava: VÚEPP, 1997. ISBN 80-88731-83-6.Šimo, D. - Rovný, P. 2010. Agrárny marketing. Nitra: SPU, 2010. 279 s. ISBN 978-80-552-0472-7.Tibenská, H. 2010. Olejniny. Situačná a výhľadová správa. Bratislava: VÚEPP, 2010.59 s. ISSN 1337-4540.Syngenta, n.d. Slnečnica. [cited 21.03.2011]. Dostupné na:http://www.syngenta.sk/index.php?produkty&plodina=Slnecnica.136
Page 1 and 2:
5/54Zeszyty NaukoweSzko³y G³ówne
Page 3 and 4:
RADA PROGRAMOWABogdan Klepacki (SGG
Page 5 and 6:
Rizovová Beáta, Gašparíkov Vero
Page 7 and 8:
Według średniego wariantu szacunk
Page 9 and 10:
Kluczowa dla zrozumienia możliwoś
Page 11 and 12:
Deklaracji w zakresie praw politycz
Page 13 and 14:
ezpieczeństwa żywnościowego powi
Page 15 and 16:
zbóż drastyczne wzrosły z dużym
Page 17 and 18:
11. Międzynarodowy Pakt Praw Gospo
Page 19 and 20:
Figure 1. Structure of sales area s
Page 21 and 22:
Figure 3. Structure of retail sales
Page 23 and 24:
etail sector is also particularly i
Page 25 and 26:
• modernity - the introduction of
Page 27 and 28:
time, place and form. Trade respons
Page 29 and 30:
The retailer must sometimes very qu
Page 31 and 32:
equipped with a pretty clear sign t
Page 33 and 34:
them. Also, very often the wrong wa
Page 35 and 36:
liquidated. Currently, fruit and ve
Page 37 and 38:
5 (54) 2011Jarosław GołębiewskiZ
Page 39 and 40:
nowe formy zawierania transakcji, o
Page 41 and 42:
koszty połączeń internetowych or
Page 43 and 44:
on ewoluować z poziomu taktycznego
Page 45 and 46:
Rysunek 1. Model 3iUczciwość mark
Page 47 and 48:
produkcji, system informacyjny, sys
Page 49 and 50:
hiperkonkurencja, problemy środowi
Page 51 and 52:
5 (54) 2011Ing. Katarína Kleinová
Page 53 and 54:
Why is it important to have a good
Page 55 and 56:
oles in international relations, tr
Page 57 and 58:
Scheme 2 Do you think that the inha
Page 59 and 60:
REFERENCES[1] GfK USA. 2011. The An
Page 61 and 62:
potrzeba przetrwanie skutków globa
Page 63 and 64:
Rysunek 2. Liczba zakładów ubezpi
Page 65 and 66:
Wzrastający udział w rynku stanow
Page 67 and 68:
W 2002 r. poprzez placówki bankowe
Page 69 and 70:
Portugalii, czy Włoch, gdzie udzia
Page 71 and 72:
companies from the Polish Financial
Page 73 and 74:
The increase in advertising expendi
Page 75 and 76:
memo ability ads an advertisement b
Page 77 and 78:
the sales can be find out from the
Page 79 and 80:
5 (54) 2011Ľubica Kubicová, Zdenk
Page 81 and 82:
Graph 1: Consumption of Milk and Da
Page 83 and 84:
Graph 3: Consumption of Yoghurt per
Page 85 and 86: On the basis of the income elastici
Page 87 and 88: Producers of Activia Sweet Strawber
Page 89 and 90: ConclusionWhen the new product come
Page 91 and 92: them in the best possible way with
Page 93 and 94: "The integration of business practi
Page 95 and 96: DJSI indexes belong to the world's
Page 97 and 98: space for staff training in this ar
Page 99 and 100: Policy to the community:11. Does yo
Page 101 and 102: SummarySocial responsibility and et
Page 103 and 104: prowadzi do zwiększenia bieżącej
Page 105 and 106: ozwijające się wskazują na wyst
Page 107 and 108: wykorzystanych w dalszej części o
Page 109 and 110: Tabl. 1. Wyniki oszacowania paramet
Page 111 and 112: 8 16,4 83,6 24,1 75,910 22,1 77,9 2
Page 113 and 114: Z kolei, uwzględniając współczy
Page 115 and 116: Literatura1. Diamond P.: National d
Page 117 and 118: - przemysł spożywczy,- handel i d
Page 119 and 120: żywnościowego nie należy bowiem
Page 121 and 122: wpływ na swoje towary. Rolnik musi
Page 123 and 124: produktów i usług do konsumentów
Page 125 and 126: Specyfika marketingu w agrobiznesie
Page 127 and 128: maksymalizację zysku, na pragnieni
Page 129 and 130: dóbr i usług wybranym klientom w
Page 131 and 132: 14. Pilarczyk B., Nestorowicz R., M
Page 133 and 134: Fibres from sunflower stems are use
Page 135: the incoming world economic crisis,
Page 139 and 140: 5 (54) 2011Beáta Rizovová, Veroni
Page 141 and 142: CostsImportance ofmedia withincommu
Page 143 and 144: 4 TABLE 3. TOP 10 ADVERTISERS AND T
Page 145 and 146: Own surveyFor processing the proble
Page 147 and 148: Following chart 3 give a review of
Page 149 and 150: Information about authorsIng. Veron
Page 151 and 152: 27 also agreed to further cut direc
Page 153 and 154: In new EU budget perspective for th
Page 155 and 156: Table 2 shows agrarian commodities
Page 157 and 158: Contact AddressIng. Patrik Rovný,
Page 159 and 160: welcomed by agrarian producers with
Page 161 and 162: they receive until December and in
Page 163 and 164: Table 1 Structure of agricultural e
Page 165 and 166: the year 2004 the change in the lev
Page 167 and 168: 3 Total liquidity (L3)Analysis of l
Page 169 and 170: make effort for its development and
Page 171 and 172: 5 (54) 2011Dušan ŠimoForeign trad
Page 173 and 174: the sales network of food chains an
Page 175 and 176: Table 3 shows the significantly inc
Page 177 and 178: 5 (54) 2011Dariusz StrzębickiSelli
Page 179 and 180: • monetary value of agricultural
Page 181 and 182: Figure 2. The website of the citrus
Page 183 and 184: service, to reduce promotional cost
Page 185 and 186: • USDA Never Ever Three - means t
Page 187 and 188:
quality. The products offered on th
Page 189 and 190:
Many of these electronic commerce B
Page 191 and 192:
commodities the market also offers
Page 193 and 194:
• thanks to the electronic market
Page 195 and 196:
delivery points. The warehouses are
Page 197 and 198:
10. Stone J.: Local farmers sell pr
Page 199 and 200:
- Means to finance the start of com
Page 201 and 202:
of investment in EUR is 132 776 and
Page 203 and 204:
Table no. 3 Overview of suitable fi
Page 205 and 206:
Slovakia lags behind not only the c
Page 207 and 208:
The main sources of information in
Page 209 and 210:
5 (54) 2011Marián TóthImpact of C
Page 211 and 212:
ResultsTaking into account the comp
Page 213 and 214:
possible and the importance of subs
Page 215 and 216:
Figure 3Profit/hectare of agricultu
show all

pobierz - WydziaÅ Nauk Ekonomicznych SGGW w Warszawie

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?

pobierz - WydziaÅ Nauk Ekonomicznych SGGW w Warszawie