12.07.2015 Views

The Clinical Guide to Supportive and Palliative Care for HIV/AIDS

The Clinical Guide to Supportive and Palliative Care for HIV/AIDS

The Clinical Guide to Supportive and Palliative Care for HIV/AIDS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A <strong>Clinical</strong> <strong>Guide</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Supportive</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Palliative</strong> <strong>Care</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>HIV</strong>/<strong>AIDS</strong> • Chapter 3: Assessment of Physical Symp<strong>to</strong>msPortenoy, et al. have developed a validated instrument <strong>for</strong> the assessment of three key dimensionsof symp<strong>to</strong>ms: frequency, severity <strong>and</strong> distress. 6 (See Figure 3-1 at the end of this chapter.) Thisinstrument mirrors in part what usually should be explored clinically in relation <strong>to</strong> each symp<strong>to</strong>m.<strong>The</strong> three26questionspicasasked of the patient on that instrument address how frequent, severe <strong>and</strong>bothersome a symp<strong>to</strong>m may be <strong>to</strong> the patient. A shorter version of this instrument has been usedin studies of patients with advanced <strong>HIV</strong> infection <strong>and</strong> has provided useful data. 5, 7Symp<strong>to</strong>m distress relates <strong>to</strong> the degree of subjective discom<strong>for</strong>t <strong>and</strong> the “bothersomeness” ofeach specific symp<strong>to</strong>m. Global symp<strong>to</strong>m distress has also been considered as a subjective conceptthat relates <strong>to</strong> the impact of all symp<strong>to</strong>ms. Symp<strong>to</strong>m distress can be described <strong>and</strong> measured.As alluded <strong>to</strong> above, the overall impact of symp<strong>to</strong>m distress is most important. A largeprospective cross-sectional survey, discussed above, of 504 ambula<strong>to</strong>ry <strong>AIDS</strong> patients found thatpatients experienced many distressing physical <strong>and</strong> psychological symp<strong>to</strong>ms <strong>and</strong> a high level ofdistress. 5 Symp<strong>to</strong>m distress significantly correlated with lower per<strong>for</strong>mance status, worse scoreson measures of psychological distress, <strong>and</strong> a poorer global quality of life.<strong>The</strong> impact of symp<strong>to</strong>ms may be described <strong>and</strong> measured in relation <strong>to</strong> specific issues or globalconstructs. Many of the specific issues <strong>for</strong>m the components of the global concept of quality oflife. <strong>The</strong> impact of a symp<strong>to</strong>m can be assessed in relation <strong>to</strong> the following:• Spheres of functioning• Family, social, financial, spiritual <strong>and</strong> existential issues• Various global constructs such as overall symp<strong>to</strong>m distress or quality of lifeFac<strong>to</strong>rs that may modulate symp<strong>to</strong>m distress may in turn be modulated by other components ofthe overall quality of life. Distress can be compounded when it is coming from multiple sources.By the same <strong>to</strong>ken, positive aspects of life frequently can mitigate some degree of distress. <strong>The</strong>multidimensional construct of quality of life reflects the broad influence of many positive <strong>and</strong>negative fac<strong>to</strong>rs on a patient’s perceived well-being. 30, 31 A diverse array of physical, emotional,social, ethical <strong>and</strong> spiritual phenomena can increase or temper distress or enhance well-being.Fac<strong>to</strong>rs from each of these areas have the potential <strong>to</strong> independently influence quality of life,<strong>and</strong> <strong>to</strong> exacerbate or lessen the distress associated with specific symp<strong>to</strong>ms. Each must there<strong>for</strong>ebe considered in symp<strong>to</strong>m assessment.IIIPRACTICAL ASPECTS OF SYMPTOM ASSESSMENT■ This section focuses on the practical aspects of symp<strong>to</strong>m assessment, discusses some populationsin which symp<strong>to</strong>m assessment can be especially challenging, <strong>and</strong> reviews available instruments<strong>for</strong> symp<strong>to</strong>m assessment.<strong>The</strong> key <strong>to</strong> symp<strong>to</strong>m assessment is a comprehensive approach as shown in Table 3-3. <strong>The</strong> healthcare provider should undertake the following tasks:• Develop an underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the patient’s current <strong>and</strong> past illness• Elicit the details of the distress caused by each symp<strong>to</strong>mU.S. Department of Health <strong>and</strong> Human Services • Health Resources <strong>and</strong> Services Administration • <strong>HIV</strong>/<strong>AIDS</strong> Bureau 45

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!