12.07.2015 Views

Financial Reporting and Ethics - The Institute of Chartered ...

Financial Reporting and Ethics - The Institute of Chartered ...

Financial Reporting and Ethics - The Institute of Chartered ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

FINANCIAL REPORTING AND ETHICSprinciple’, is an ethical theory that holds that an action is right ifit produces, or if it tends to produce, the greatest amount <strong>of</strong> goodfor the greatest number <strong>of</strong> people affected by the action.Otherwise the action is wrong.According to Bentham actions were right if they tended to producethe greatest happiness for the greatest number <strong>of</strong> people.(e)(f)<strong>The</strong> deontological theories determine the ethics <strong>of</strong> an act bylooking to the process <strong>of</strong> the decision (the means). <strong>The</strong>deontological tradition holds that what makes an action right isnot the sum <strong>of</strong> its consequences, but the fact that it conforms tothe moral law. This concept addresses the issue <strong>of</strong> obligation orduty. Under this basis, an action or decision is justified for thefact, in itself, that it is good.Kantianism (<strong>Ethics</strong> <strong>of</strong> Duty)<strong>The</strong> German philosopher, Immanuel Kant (1728-1804) is a majorcontributor to <strong>Ethics</strong> <strong>of</strong> duty. He thought that morality <strong>and</strong> thequestion <strong>of</strong> rightness <strong>and</strong> wrongness <strong>of</strong> actions was not dependenton a particular situation or on the consequences <strong>of</strong> the action.Rather, morality was simply a question <strong>of</strong> certain eternal, abstract<strong>and</strong> unchangeable principles that humans should apply to allethical problems. Hence his moral philosophy is deontological.To be moral, therefore, one must consciously act according torules previously calculated by ‘reason’ to be right or just, <strong>and</strong>the incentive for observing those rules must be respected for dutyalone.Kant, consequently, articulated what could be seen as a guide towhat ought to be our commitment to duty by developing atheoretical framework through which these principles could bederived. This he called the ‘categorical imperative’. By this hemeant that this theoretical framework should be applied to everymoral issue regardless <strong>of</strong> who is involved, who pr<strong>of</strong>its <strong>and</strong> whois harmed by the principles once applied in specific situations.<strong>The</strong> ‘categorical Imperative’ consists mainly <strong>of</strong> three parts, butwe shall dwell on the first two formulations. <strong>The</strong> first formulationstates,Act only according to that maxim by which you can at thesame time will that it should become a universal law.De George explains this formulation to mean that, for any actionto be morally right, it must be capable <strong>of</strong> being consistentlyuniversalisable. By implication, if any action is moral for me, it124

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!