12.07.2015 Views

Financial Reporting and Ethics - The Institute of Chartered ...

Financial Reporting and Ethics - The Institute of Chartered ...

Financial Reporting and Ethics - The Institute of Chartered ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES IN ETHICSbecause according to the advocates, it is only when business focus onpr<strong>of</strong>it that business will provide good service that consumers want, whichwould then promote the societal well-being. This was propounded byAdam Smith, to whom this theory is traceable. He maintained that thefree pursuit <strong>of</strong> self-interest without the intent to benefit the society will,as if directed by an invisible h<strong>and</strong>, bring about more social benefitthan if visible h<strong>and</strong>s (government intervention) try to intervene <strong>and</strong>bring about just results In <strong>The</strong> Wealth <strong>of</strong> Nation, this view was articulatedthus:It is not from the benevolence <strong>of</strong> the butcher, the brewer or thebaker, that we expect our dinner, but from their regard to theirown interest… He…neither intends to promote the publicinterest, nor knows how much he is promoting it … <strong>and</strong> bydirecting that industry in such a manner as its produce may be<strong>of</strong> the greatest value, he intends only his own gain, <strong>and</strong> he is inthis, as in many other cases led by an invisible h<strong>and</strong> to promotean end which was not part <strong>of</strong> his intention. Nor is it always theworse for society that it was no part <strong>of</strong> it. But by pursuing hisown interest he frequently promotes that <strong>of</strong> the society moreefficiently than when he really intends to promote it.<strong>The</strong> stakeholder theory which opposes the shareholder theoryprimarily began as a response to the belief that the owners <strong>of</strong> share orstock should be the prime beneficiaries <strong>of</strong> the organisations. That is tosay that the firm should be run in such a way as to maximise the wealth<strong>of</strong> shareowners. <strong>The</strong> stakeholder theory, on the other h<strong>and</strong>, suggeststhat there is a multiplicity <strong>of</strong> groups having a stake in the operation <strong>of</strong>the firm, all <strong>of</strong> whom merit consideration in the management’s decisionmaking <strong>and</strong> whose needs must be met. This is clearly an attempt to“redefine the purpose <strong>of</strong> the firm; this is to serve as a vehicle forcoordinating stakeholder interest”. In other words, the concern <strong>of</strong> thebusiness managers ought to go beyond pr<strong>of</strong>it to include helping societygain a greater sense <strong>of</strong> the meaning <strong>of</strong> community by honouringindividual dignity <strong>and</strong> promoting overall welfare <strong>and</strong> accommodatewider stakeholder interests.Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Merric Dodd <strong>of</strong> Harvard Law School disagreed with Berle’sthesis <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> course the shareholders theory. He posited in his view thatbusiness corporation is an economic institution which has a social serviceas well as a pr<strong>of</strong>it-making function. <strong>The</strong> ideal purpose <strong>of</strong> the corporation<strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> course the corporate managers, he argued is not confined tomaking money for shareholders. In his view, it is more secured jobs forthe employees; better quality products for customers <strong>and</strong> greatercontributions to the well-being <strong>of</strong> the community as a whole.249

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!