12.07.2015 Views

Financial Reporting and Ethics - The Institute of Chartered ...

Financial Reporting and Ethics - The Institute of Chartered ...

Financial Reporting and Ethics - The Institute of Chartered ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ETHICAL FRAMEWORK, CONCEPTS AND VALUEmust be moral for anyone else; everyone should be able to followthe same underlying principle. For instance, there can be noexception to the principle that murder is immoral or that lying isimmoral. We are therefore comm<strong>and</strong>ed to do what is morallyright, which must be such that, in doing it, none <strong>of</strong> us interfereswith or prevents others from doing it. As De George observes, “inmany instances people who act immorally trade on the fact thatnot everyone does what they do”.<strong>The</strong> second formulation otherwise referred to as the principle <strong>of</strong>humanity goes thus:Act so that you treat humanity, whether is your own personor in that <strong>of</strong> another, always as an end <strong>and</strong> never as ameans only.Kant’s emphasis here is on the rational nature <strong>of</strong> humans asfree, intelligent <strong>and</strong> self directing beings. This nature <strong>of</strong>rationality is the basis for his/her value as an end in itself.Because <strong>of</strong> this, “a rational being is worthwhile, has dignity <strong>and</strong>is worthy <strong>of</strong> respect. Hence each person should be treated byevery person as an end, with respect <strong>and</strong> dignity…”This formulation forbids us to ‘use’ people <strong>and</strong> manipulate themmerely as means to our own ends. According to Kant, it is adifferent statement <strong>of</strong> the supreme moral law contained in thefirst formulation. Hence, it comm<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> forbids the sameactions as the first formulation. <strong>The</strong> formula <strong>of</strong> the end-in-itself,according to Kant, generates both negative <strong>and</strong> positive duties.In the negative sense, we treat persons as ends when we do notinterfere with their pursuit <strong>of</strong> their (legitimate) ends. In thepositive sense we treat persons as ends when we endeavour tohelp them realize their (legitimate) ends. It entails making otherpeople’s ends one’s ends, <strong>and</strong> requires that we do those acts whichare necessary to further the permissible ends <strong>of</strong> others.Finally, the treatments that rational beings deserve as ends inthemselves, could also be seen in the form <strong>of</strong> right. People thushave right to life, <strong>and</strong> this right imposes obligation, on othersnot to take their life <strong>and</strong> in certain conditions to help thempreserve it.(g)Aristotlelism (Virtue <strong>Ethics</strong>)<strong>The</strong> moral values <strong>of</strong> actions are <strong>of</strong>ten times considered onparticular actions, virtue ethics, however starts from a differentperspective. Instead <strong>of</strong> evaluating every single action based on125

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!