12.07.2015 Views

Financial Reporting and Ethics - The Institute of Chartered ...

Financial Reporting and Ethics - The Institute of Chartered ...

Financial Reporting and Ethics - The Institute of Chartered ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

FINANCIAL REPORTING AND ETHICS12.2.3 Background <strong>and</strong> Debate in Corporate Social ResponsibilityAdolph A. Berle in a debate published in the Harvard Law Review in1932 argued that the primary purpose <strong>of</strong> business organisation orcorporation should be to make money for its shareholders. According tohim, “All powers granted to a corporation or to any group within thecorporation are at all times exercisable only for the ratable benefits <strong>of</strong>all the shareholders as their interest appears.”In 1970, Friedman Milton published a short essay ‘<strong>The</strong> SocialResponsibility <strong>of</strong> Business is to increase its pr<strong>of</strong>its’ <strong>The</strong> New York TimesMagazine, September 13, 1970, which has generated a lot <strong>of</strong> controversyever since. In his argument corporations should pursue their economicself interest. He held in the essay that there is one <strong>and</strong> only one socialresponsibility <strong>of</strong> business, which is to use its resources <strong>and</strong> engage inactivities designed to maximise pr<strong>of</strong>its for the shareholders. Accordingto him, “...a corporate executive is an employee <strong>of</strong> the owners <strong>of</strong> thebusiness. He has direct responsibility to his employers. Thatresponsibility is to conduct the business in accordance with their desires,which generally will be to make as much money as possible….”He went further to posit that any attempt to promote corporate socialresponsibility, however it might be defined, amounts to moral wrong.Friedman questioned the logic <strong>of</strong> corporate social responsibility as ithad developed. He insisted that in a democratic society, governmentwas the only legitimate vehicle for addressing social concerns. Thusthe function <strong>of</strong> business in a society, which is to maximise pr<strong>of</strong>its, shouldnot be confused with other social functions performed by governments,institutions <strong>and</strong> charities.Friedman <strong>and</strong> others co represent the shareholder theory which claimsthat the purpose <strong>of</strong> the firm is to maximise the welfare <strong>of</strong> theshareholders, perhaps subject to some moral or social constraints. <strong>The</strong>reason for this, Frederick Hayek in 1969 wrote is that the organisationsare the private properties <strong>of</strong> the shareholders thus; every businessorganisation or corporation must aim at maximising pr<strong>of</strong>its to enhanceshareholders value. And by the organisations pursuing their selfinterestswould ensure the most efficient economic activities <strong>and</strong>outcomes. Hayek goes further to argue that shareholders’ property rightsin the corporation must be fully protected <strong>and</strong> their control <strong>of</strong> thecorporation strengthened. This position implies that the shareholdersare the only legal stakeholders <strong>of</strong> any organisation because <strong>of</strong> theirinvestment, which also makes the corporation their private property.Central to this theory is the belief that the managers have a fiduciaryduty to act in the interest <strong>of</strong> the shareholders to maximise the return oninvestment, with no direct concern to the well-being <strong>of</strong> the society248

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!