30.11.2012 Views

Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications

Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications

Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The selection of any petrol station clears the list <strong>and</strong><br />

displays a new page with information only about the<br />

selected station. The user has to navigate ‘back’ <strong>and</strong><br />

‘forth’ between the search result list <strong>and</strong> the details page<br />

for each petrol station in order to compare information.<br />

Figure 1 - Search result for petrol station as list in mapbased<br />

tablet application<br />

The search engine interaction model (Figure 2, left side)<br />

illustrates users’ interaction with SERPs, moving back <strong>and</strong><br />

forth between search results (A, B, C, D) <strong>and</strong> the actual<br />

SERP (central point).<br />

Figure 2 - Contrasting Interaction Models<br />

However, none of the alternative approaches such as<br />

contextual search [6] <strong>and</strong> search result clustering [7]<br />

challenges the current paradigm of how users interact with<br />

the results. This becomes the more apparent when<br />

considering that the user is performing the search in a<br />

moving vehicle. For instance, the driver may want to<br />

search for a petrol station with the cheapest fuel <strong>and</strong> with a<br />

cash machine – this would require exploration of the<br />

facilities <strong>and</strong> comparison of the pricelist of many petrol<br />

stations – a tedious task using the paradigm described.<br />

In-Car UI<br />

The majority of research on interactions with in-car<br />

information systems has focused on the driver <strong>and</strong> the<br />

devices that are integrated in the vehicle or used primarily<br />

for navigation. Comparatively fewer works – if at all -<br />

have looked at the user experience of systems targeted at<br />

tablets for use by both drivers <strong>and</strong> passengers. Any system<br />

for use by drivers must prioritise safety of use, for obvious<br />

reasons. Such systems provide a poor user experience from<br />

a passenger’s point of view, but may also exclude the<br />

passenger from effectively using such a system. Yet, a<br />

system that considers both passenger <strong>and</strong> driver<br />

requirements may ultimately provide a better <strong>and</strong> safer<br />

experience for both. In their work, Inbar <strong>and</strong> Tractinsky<br />

[5] refer to passengers as “incidental users”, who can<br />

“buffer the driver from information overload”. They argue<br />

that “the traditional, driver-focused design of car<br />

dashboards, entirely overlooks this possibility [of sharing<br />

information with passengers]”. Inbar <strong>and</strong> Tractinsky raise<br />

a number of interesting motivations for designing IVIS<br />

that are more inclusive for passengers in front or back<br />

seats, however their primary focus is on how existing<br />

driver dashboards may be re-designed. Yet with the<br />

emergence of a whole new range of mobile devices, smart<br />

phones <strong>and</strong> tablets in particular, dedicated devices that can<br />

serve as a passenger-centric front-end to IVIS become<br />

increasingly relevant. Focusing on a dedicated user<br />

interface for passengers introduces an entirely different set<br />

of user requirements than one would apply to drivercentric<br />

user interfaces.<br />

In Beeharee et al. [1] the authors discuss the application of<br />

a dedicated information exploration user interface for<br />

“intelligent in-car services” which is designed to address<br />

the limitations described above. While it was initially<br />

discussed as a potentially effective driver-centric interface,<br />

in this paper we explore its applicability as a passengercentric<br />

interface. In contrast to traditional search user<br />

interfaces, the described information exploration interface<br />

– also referred to as Focus-Metaphor Interface (FMI) [3] -<br />

enables seamless exploration of the underlying information<br />

spaces<br />

SAFETRIP<br />

From our study, it is evident that information exploration<br />

is more frequent during long trips across unfamiliar region<br />

<strong>and</strong> beyond country borders. The requirements for high<br />

b<strong>and</strong>width <strong>and</strong> geographical coverage call for connectivity<br />

solutions beyond cellular network – which typically suffer<br />

from poor coverage along much of the road network in<br />

uninhabited regions. The SafeTRIP project [2] aims to<br />

utilize a new generation of satellite technology to improve<br />

the safety, security <strong>and</strong> environmental sustainability of<br />

road transport. The project will deliver an open platform<br />

that exploits the advantages of the satellite communication<br />

component to allow for innovative <strong>and</strong> sustainable<br />

automotive services.<br />

Figure 3 - The SafeTRIP concept

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!