Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications
Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications
Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The selection of any petrol station clears the list <strong>and</strong><br />
displays a new page with information only about the<br />
selected station. The user has to navigate ‘back’ <strong>and</strong><br />
‘forth’ between the search result list <strong>and</strong> the details page<br />
for each petrol station in order to compare information.<br />
Figure 1 - Search result for petrol station as list in mapbased<br />
tablet application<br />
The search engine interaction model (Figure 2, left side)<br />
illustrates users’ interaction with SERPs, moving back <strong>and</strong><br />
forth between search results (A, B, C, D) <strong>and</strong> the actual<br />
SERP (central point).<br />
Figure 2 - Contrasting Interaction Models<br />
However, none of the alternative approaches such as<br />
contextual search [6] <strong>and</strong> search result clustering [7]<br />
challenges the current paradigm of how users interact with<br />
the results. This becomes the more apparent when<br />
considering that the user is performing the search in a<br />
moving vehicle. For instance, the driver may want to<br />
search for a petrol station with the cheapest fuel <strong>and</strong> with a<br />
cash machine – this would require exploration of the<br />
facilities <strong>and</strong> comparison of the pricelist of many petrol<br />
stations – a tedious task using the paradigm described.<br />
In-Car UI<br />
The majority of research on interactions with in-car<br />
information systems has focused on the driver <strong>and</strong> the<br />
devices that are integrated in the vehicle or used primarily<br />
for navigation. Comparatively fewer works – if at all -<br />
have looked at the user experience of systems targeted at<br />
tablets for use by both drivers <strong>and</strong> passengers. Any system<br />
for use by drivers must prioritise safety of use, for obvious<br />
reasons. Such systems provide a poor user experience from<br />
a passenger’s point of view, but may also exclude the<br />
passenger from effectively using such a system. Yet, a<br />
system that considers both passenger <strong>and</strong> driver<br />
requirements may ultimately provide a better <strong>and</strong> safer<br />
experience for both. In their work, Inbar <strong>and</strong> Tractinsky<br />
[5] refer to passengers as “incidental users”, who can<br />
“buffer the driver from information overload”. They argue<br />
that “the traditional, driver-focused design of car<br />
dashboards, entirely overlooks this possibility [of sharing<br />
information with passengers]”. Inbar <strong>and</strong> Tractinsky raise<br />
a number of interesting motivations for designing IVIS<br />
that are more inclusive for passengers in front or back<br />
seats, however their primary focus is on how existing<br />
driver dashboards may be re-designed. Yet with the<br />
emergence of a whole new range of mobile devices, smart<br />
phones <strong>and</strong> tablets in particular, dedicated devices that can<br />
serve as a passenger-centric front-end to IVIS become<br />
increasingly relevant. Focusing on a dedicated user<br />
interface for passengers introduces an entirely different set<br />
of user requirements than one would apply to drivercentric<br />
user interfaces.<br />
In Beeharee et al. [1] the authors discuss the application of<br />
a dedicated information exploration user interface for<br />
“intelligent in-car services” which is designed to address<br />
the limitations described above. While it was initially<br />
discussed as a potentially effective driver-centric interface,<br />
in this paper we explore its applicability as a passengercentric<br />
interface. In contrast to traditional search user<br />
interfaces, the described information exploration interface<br />
– also referred to as Focus-Metaphor Interface (FMI) [3] -<br />
enables seamless exploration of the underlying information<br />
spaces<br />
SAFETRIP<br />
From our study, it is evident that information exploration<br />
is more frequent during long trips across unfamiliar region<br />
<strong>and</strong> beyond country borders. The requirements for high<br />
b<strong>and</strong>width <strong>and</strong> geographical coverage call for connectivity<br />
solutions beyond cellular network – which typically suffer<br />
from poor coverage along much of the road network in<br />
uninhabited regions. The SafeTRIP project [2] aims to<br />
utilize a new generation of satellite technology to improve<br />
the safety, security <strong>and</strong> environmental sustainability of<br />
road transport. The project will deliver an open platform<br />
that exploits the advantages of the satellite communication<br />
component to allow for innovative <strong>and</strong> sustainable<br />
automotive services.<br />
Figure 3 - The SafeTRIP concept