Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications
Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications
Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
IVAT (In-Vehicle Assistive Technology):<br />
Multimodal Design Issues for TBI Drivers<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
Individuals who have survived a traumatic brain injury (TBI) can<br />
experience a variety of sequelae that may limit their ability to<br />
drive. Despite great safety risks, the majority of individuals who<br />
return to driving following a TBI do so without ever undergoing<br />
formal evaluation [1]. Assistive technology can be leveraged in<br />
the context of driving to facilitate autonomy for this population.<br />
Multisensory integration is known to have facilitatory capabilities<br />
at the neural, cognitive, <strong>and</strong> behavioral levels. We have the<br />
opportunity to address the needs of this user group by utilizing invehicle<br />
multimodal interfaces. The aim of our in-vehicle assistive<br />
technology (IVAT) project is to increase driver safety by first<br />
considering individual abilities <strong>and</strong> limitations <strong>and</strong> then tailoring<br />
support to meet those specific needs. We have developed an initial<br />
iteration of such a system through a user-centered design process<br />
with both rehabilitative driving evaluators <strong>and</strong> drivers with TBI.<br />
Our goal is to enable individuals to overcome limitations <strong>and</strong><br />
regain some independence by driving after injury. The purpose of<br />
the current paper is to outline the findings from our needs<br />
assessment for this population of drivers <strong>and</strong> highlight the critical<br />
concepts drawn from multimodal perception theory that could be<br />
integrated into addressing the needs of these drivers.<br />
Categories <strong>and</strong> Subject Descriptors<br />
J.4 [Computer <strong>Applications</strong>]: Social <strong>and</strong> Behavioral Sciences –<br />
Psychology.<br />
General Terms<br />
Performance, Design, Human Factors<br />
Keywords<br />
Driving, Cognitive Limitations, TBI, Assistive Technology,<br />
Human Factors<br />
1. INTRODUCTION<br />
Millions of people incur, <strong>and</strong> then strive to recover from,<br />
traumatic brain injuries (TBI) each year. Following extensive<br />
rehabilitation, they are often able to reintegrate into daily life. The<br />
ability to drive a car unsupervised is often a critical factor in<br />
regaining independence [2]. Unfortunately, many TBI survivors<br />
(<strong>and</strong> indeed people with various disabilities) have residual<br />
perceptual, cognitive, motor, or affect-control deficits that impact<br />
their ability to drive, among other activities. Much of what is<br />
understood about normal perception during driving has been<br />
Copyright held by author(s)<br />
<strong>Automotive</strong>UI'11, November 29-December 2, 2011, Salzburg, Austria<br />
Adjunct Proceedings<br />
Julia DeBlasio Olsheski, Bruce N. Walker<br />
Sonification Lab, Georgia Institute of Technology<br />
Atlanta, GA 30308<br />
+1-404-894-8265<br />
julia@gatech.edu, bruce.walker@psych.gatech.edu<br />
- 11 -<br />
derived from unimodal studies, as these were traditionally the<br />
focus within perception research. Though unimodal literature has<br />
contributed greatly to our underst<strong>and</strong>ing, its overemphasis has left<br />
critical gaps in perceptual theory [3]. Interactions within the<br />
driving environment are almost never truly unimodal. Though the<br />
sensory channels are differentiated, the experience is not of a<br />
fragmented collection of sensations, but rather an integrated<br />
concept of the external world. Sensory information from multiple<br />
modalities must be integrated online despite vast differences in<br />
initial cognitive encoding [3]. Audiovisual integration research<br />
has direct implications for modern display design <strong>and</strong> can be<br />
particularly useful in the context of driving, a task that heavily<br />
taxes the visual modality.<br />
The IVAT (In-Vehicle Assistive Technology) system is a<br />
framework for developing a range of multimodal assistive<br />
applications, each tuned to the particular needs of the individual.<br />
The IVAT research team is particularly well suited for tackling<br />
issues with driving after TBI. The Shepherd Center, a private, notfor-profit<br />
hospital specializing in research <strong>and</strong> rehabilitation for<br />
people with spinal cord <strong>and</strong> brain injury, is recognized as one of<br />
the U.S.’s leading rehabilitation centers. The Sonification<br />
Laboratory at Georgia Tech focuses on the development <strong>and</strong><br />
evaluation of auditory <strong>and</strong> multimodal interfaces, paying<br />
particular attention to Human Factors in the display of<br />
information in complex task environments. The Georgia Tech<br />
School of Psychology’s Driving Simulator Facility houses a<br />
National Advanced Driving Simulator (NADS) MiniSim featuring<br />
full field-of-view immersive environments (see Figure 1). In the<br />
current research, an in-vehicle PC is utilized with Centrafuse<br />
Application Integration Framework software that merges<br />
connected car technology <strong>and</strong> IVAT within a multimodal in-dash<br />
touch screen interface. IVAT utilizes positive reinforcement to<br />
promote skills <strong>and</strong> behaviors known to increase driver safety.<br />
Figure 1. IVAT in-dash display