12.07.2015 Views

Value Co-Creation in Industrial Buyer-Seller Partnerships ... - Doria

Value Co-Creation in Industrial Buyer-Seller Partnerships ... - Doria

Value Co-Creation in Industrial Buyer-Seller Partnerships ... - Doria

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6.7.5 <strong>Co</strong>mments on <strong>in</strong>ternal issuesAt the <strong>Buyer</strong> it was said that the local the <strong>Seller</strong> people are good and responsive, but thatthey sometimes have difficulties <strong>in</strong> communicat<strong>in</strong>g with<strong>in</strong> their own organization. Eventhough the local people and Mr SR1&2 work accord<strong>in</strong>g to the spirit of the cooperationagreement, the rest of the organization sometimes fails to live up to it, mak<strong>in</strong>g it impossiblefor the <strong>Buyer</strong> team to fulfill its obligations.At the <strong>Seller</strong> it was said that not everybody work<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> day-to-day operations <strong>in</strong> the<strong>Buyer</strong> organization have accepted the spirit of the cooperation agreement, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>violations of the agreed terms. This is felt to be due to management fail<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>communicat<strong>in</strong>g clearly the spirit and the implications of the cooperation agreementthroughout the organization.In summary it can be said that the message from both organizations was that thecounterpart did not live up to the agreement 100 % and that this mostly was due to problems<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternal communication.6.8 Summ<strong>in</strong>g up the status of the partnership <strong>in</strong> January 2004In January 2004 a partnership sem<strong>in</strong>ar between the <strong>Seller</strong> and the <strong>Buyer</strong> was organized bythe <strong>Buyer</strong>. The idea was to <strong>in</strong>vite everybody who is <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>teraction between thetwo companies. This partnership sem<strong>in</strong>ar was a last attempt by the found<strong>in</strong>g fathers of thepartnership idea, Mr BR9 and Mr SR1&2, to make the partnership work. They still believed<strong>in</strong> their vision and did not want to give up on it, although there was resistance andsuspiciousness towards the partnership <strong>in</strong> both organizations. At the time of the firstpartnership sem<strong>in</strong>ar Mr BR15 from the <strong>Buyer</strong> had been appo<strong>in</strong>ted by Mr BR9 to take chargeof develop<strong>in</strong>g the partnership with the <strong>Seller</strong>. Thus there was a dedicated resource from the<strong>Buyer</strong> assigned for the job.The purpose of the first partnership sem<strong>in</strong>ar was to discuss how the partnership couldbe taken to the next level. The goal was to foster trust and respect, to formulate a jo<strong>in</strong>tvision for the partnership, and to encourage open communication and create functionalchannels of communication. The key benefits for the participants of the sem<strong>in</strong>ar were firstof all to solve current conflicts face-to-face, and more generally to learn to understand theidea of the partnership.At this time it was obvious that there were a number of unresolved issues between thecompanies and that both companies had failed <strong>in</strong> some ways to live up to the cooperationagreement. The <strong>Seller</strong> had communicated <strong>in</strong>adequately about technical problems and the123

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!