Barney, JB. (1991). Firms resources and susta<strong>in</strong>ed competitive advantage. Journal of Management17, pp 99-120.Berger, P, & Luckmann, T. (1967). The Social <strong>Co</strong>nstruction of Reality - A Treatise <strong>in</strong> the Sociologyof Knowledge, Harmondsworth, England: Pengu<strong>in</strong> BooksBiong, H., Wathne, K., and Parvatiyar, A, (1997), Why Do Some <strong>Co</strong>mpanies Not Want to Engage<strong>in</strong> Partner<strong>in</strong>g Relationships, <strong>in</strong> Relationships and Networks <strong>in</strong> International Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Markets,H.G.Gemünden, T. Ritter and A. Walter eds. Elsevier Science, New York, pp 91-107.Bonoma, T.V., Salzman, G., & Johston, W.J., (1977). <strong>Industrial</strong> buy<strong>in</strong>g behavior, Cambridte, MA,Market<strong>in</strong>g Science InstituteBorys, B. & Jemison, D.B., (1989). Hybrid Arrangements as Strategic Alliances: Theoretical Issues<strong>in</strong> Organizational <strong>Co</strong>mb<strong>in</strong>ations, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp 234-249Burns, T. & Stalker, G.M. (1961). The management of <strong>in</strong>novation, Tavistock Publications, LondonCapra, F. (1997). The Web of Life, London: Flam<strong>in</strong>go/Harper <strong>Co</strong>ll<strong>in</strong>s<strong>Co</strong>ll<strong>in</strong>s Paperback English Dictionary (1992)<strong>Co</strong>rb<strong>in</strong>, A & Strauss, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures fordevelop<strong>in</strong>g grounded theory, 2nd edition, CA:SageDas, T.K. & Teng, B-S., (2000). A resource-based theory of strategic alliances, Journal ofManagement, 26, pp 31-61Day, G. (1995). Advantageous Alliances, Journal of the Academy of Market<strong>in</strong>g Science, 23, pp297-300Day, G.S. & Wensley, R., (1983). Market<strong>in</strong>g theory with a strategic orientation, Journal ofmarket<strong>in</strong>g, 47, pp 78-89De Chernatory, L., Harris, F., & Dall'Olmo Riley, F., (2000). Added value: its nature, roels andsusta<strong>in</strong>ability, European Journal of Market<strong>in</strong>g, 34, pp 39 56Denz<strong>in</strong>, N.K., (1989a). Interpretive biography, Newbury Park, CA:SageDenz<strong>in</strong>, N.K., (1989b). Interpretive <strong>in</strong>teractionism, Newbury Park, CA:SageDill, W.R., (1958). Environment as an <strong>in</strong>fluence on managerial autonomy, Adm<strong>in</strong>istrative ScienceQuarterly, 2, pp 409-443Dubois, A., & Gadde, L-E., ( 2000). Supply strategy and network effects: Purcahs<strong>in</strong>g behaviour <strong>in</strong>the construction <strong>in</strong>dustry, European Journal of Purchas<strong>in</strong>g and Supply Management, 6, pp207-215183
Dyer, J & S<strong>in</strong>gh, H (1998). The relational view: cooperative strategy and sources of<strong>in</strong>terorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review 23, pp 660-679.Dyer, J.H & Noboeka, K (2000) Creat<strong>in</strong>g and manag<strong>in</strong>g a high-performance knowledge-shar<strong>in</strong>gnetwork: the Toyota case. Strategic Management Journal 21 (3), pp 345-367.Eisenhardt, K.M., (1989). Build<strong>in</strong>g theories from case study research, Academy of ManagementReview, Vol. 14, No.4, pp 532-550Ellram, L.M. (1995). Total cost of ownership: An analysis approach for purchas<strong>in</strong>g. InternationalJournal of Physical Distribution and Logistics, 25, pp. 4-23Emery, F.G. & Trist, E.L. (1968). The causal texture of organizational environments, 17th Intcongress on psychology, Wash<strong>in</strong>gton DCEngeström, Y. (1987). Learn<strong>in</strong>g by Expand<strong>in</strong>g: An activity-theoretical approach to developmentalresearch, Hels<strong>in</strong>ki, Orienta-Konsultit OyEskola, J. & Suoranta, J. (1998). Johdatus laadulliseen tutkimukseen, Vastapa<strong>in</strong>o: TampereField<strong>in</strong>g, N.G. & Field<strong>in</strong>g, L.J. (1986). L<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g data, Beverly Hills, CA:SageFlick, U., (1992). Triangulation revisited: Strategy of validation or alternative?, Journal for theoryof social behaviour, 22, pp 175-198Fl<strong>in</strong>t, D.J., Woodruff, R.B and Gardial, S.F. (1997), Customer <strong>Value</strong> Change <strong>in</strong> <strong>Industrial</strong>Market<strong>in</strong>g Relationships: A Call for New Strategies and Research, <strong>Industrial</strong> Market<strong>in</strong>gManagement 26, pp 163-175.Ford, D. (1980), The development of buyer-seller relationships <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustrial markets, EuropeanJournal of Market<strong>in</strong>g, Vol. 14, pp 339-354Ford, D, Håkansson, H and Johanson, J (2002), How do companies <strong>in</strong>teract?, In: Understand<strong>in</strong>gbus<strong>in</strong>ess market<strong>in</strong>g and purchas<strong>in</strong>g, 3rd edition, Thomson Learn<strong>in</strong>gFord, D., (Ed.) (1990). Understand<strong>in</strong>g bus<strong>in</strong>ess markets, Academic Press, LondonFord, D., Gadde L-E., Håkansson, H., BR2gren, A., Snehota, I., Turnbull, P., & Wilson, D.(1998).Manag<strong>in</strong>g Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Relationships, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, ChichesterFord, D., Gadde L-E., Håkansson, H., Snehota, I., (2003). Manag<strong>in</strong>g Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Relationships, ScondEd. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, EnglandForsström, B., (1997). The <strong>Seller</strong> Mar<strong>in</strong>e Customer Satisfaction Survey South-Korea,(confidential)Forsström, B., (1997). The <strong>Seller</strong> Mar<strong>in</strong>e Customer Satisfaction Survey Italy, (confidential)Forsström, B., (1998). Licens<strong>in</strong>g Survey Germany, Japan, South-Korea, Ch<strong>in</strong>a, (confidential)184
- Page 1 and 2:
Birgitta ForsströmValue Co-Creatio
- Page 3 and 4:
VALUE CO-CREATION IN INDUSTRIAL BUY
- Page 5 and 6:
CIP Cataloguing in PublicationForss
- Page 7 and 8:
Suokannas and Annica Isacsson my de
- Page 9 and 10:
3.3 The use of the value concept in
- Page 11 and 12:
7.2.1 Price as a benefit and a sacr
- Page 13 and 14:
Figure 8.1: Interdependence, involv
- Page 15 and 16:
81. INTRODUCTIONEconomic theory rel
- Page 17 and 18:
Portfolio management and key accoun
- Page 19 and 20:
value - ways to understand and thin
- Page 21 and 22:
creation in a world of relationship
- Page 23 and 24:
Möller and Halinen-Kaila (1999) cr
- Page 25 and 26:
Value of a Relationship: When discu
- Page 27 and 28:
1.3 Outline of the studyThe study s
- Page 30 and 31:
in such relationships, and on how t
- Page 32 and 33:
2.2 Research approach“ Human gras
- Page 34 and 35:
“ In case study both the research
- Page 36 and 37:
interview ended up being different
- Page 38 and 39:
simplifying and combining observati
- Page 40 and 41:
the purpose of why it is studied an
- Page 42 and 43:
started paying attention to issues
- Page 44 and 45:
The analysis of the material was an
- Page 47:
are: setting the boundaries of the
- Page 50 and 51:
Critical events during the process
- Page 52 and 53:
interviewing, observing, reading, r
- Page 54 and 55:
unit. Going even further back in hi
- Page 56 and 57:
3.4.1 Overview of the use of the va
- Page 58 and 59:
ç-è1éWèê9ë ì9í!î¹ï5ðWí
- Page 60 and 61:
argumentation alters the traditiona
- Page 62 and 63:
zG{\| }C~t s oHpaqfrRs t s qXu2vs y
- Page 64 and 65:
industries. Innovation is the sourc
- Page 66 and 67:
ôô3.7 SummaryThe assessment of va
- Page 68 and 69:
4. A RELATIONAL APPROACH TO VALUE C
- Page 70 and 71:
est way to organize, any way of org
- Page 72 and 73:
4.2 The IMP view on relationships a
- Page 74 and 75:
The focus and unit of analysis of t
- Page 76 and 77:
ecent book discuss how creating val
- Page 78 and 79:
not simply mutual dependence betwee
- Page 80 and 81:
3n3465-7 89;:=©:¡?@95AB
- Page 82 and 83:
interdependence is associated with
- Page 84 and 85:
“ The performance of supplier arr
- Page 86 and 87:
Figure 4.5: Different value creatin
- Page 88 and 89:
“ organizational arrangements tha
- Page 90 and 91:
There is no simple or universal def
- Page 92 and 93:
The question of win-win in partners
- Page 94 and 95:
The following chapter, number five,
- Page 96 and 97:
The world cruise industry is domina
- Page 98 and 99:
Figure 5.2: The actors and the setu
- Page 100 and 101:
ù õ ñ ù õ ó*ÿ¡ ÷£¢ ñ¤
- Page 102 and 103:
:: ]:: ]In normal cases the Seller
- Page 104 and 105:
the top 10 suppliers for the cruise
- Page 106 and 107:
6. THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE RELATIONS
- Page 108 and 109:
In 1997 when Mr BR9 got the positio
- Page 110 and 111:
The relationship between the compan
- Page 112 and 113:
” He (BR9) often talks about the
- Page 114 and 115:
With some years of experience with
- Page 116 and 117:
offering, the Buyer still sees the
- Page 118 and 119:
When the Seller realized that they
- Page 120 and 121:
we have a new development in the pr
- Page 122 and 123:
to serving the customers - the part
- Page 124 and 125:
” This is the most problematic ag
- Page 126 and 127:
• Optimize operations i.e. fuel o
- Page 128 and 129:
They also commented that the person
- Page 130 and 131:
6.7.5 Comments on internal issuesAt
- Page 132 and 133:
changes, and that the Seller would
- Page 134 and 135:
survey 14 that the Seller had condu
- Page 136 and 137:
uuuuuuu uuuuuuuuuuuuuuue¦f¨gh ijk
- Page 138 and 139:
Seller. At present there are three
- Page 140 and 141: 15 - a factor that should not be ne
- Page 142 and 143: elationship and the people interact
- Page 144 and 145: + K !ñ ú ê ñ ê ö ë î ñ ï
- Page 146 and 147: 7.1 Perceived value as a prerequisi
- Page 148 and 149: ” We are in the process of develo
- Page 150 and 151: and that is insane. We must be able
- Page 152 and 153: è èèèè èèèè èè èè èè
- Page 154 and 155: We learn their way of handling thin
- Page 156 and 157: Price receivedThe price received ca
- Page 158 and 159: partnership with the Seller, the as
- Page 160 and 161: In the light of this, one could say
- Page 162 and 163: dependence. If managers were not ab
- Page 164 and 165: ¥(¦§¨&©G§ªG¦(£(«¬¨$Z
- Page 166 and 167: Seller’ s products and concepts,
- Page 168 and 169: forth between the companies. This h
- Page 170 and 171: What I found even more interesting
- Page 172 and 173: The Buyer sees that the interest fo
- Page 174 and 175: decision to pursue a collaborative
- Page 176 and 177: methodology. I will also direct som
- Page 178 and 179: years to come. Consequently the par
- Page 180 and 181: €‚ƒ‡ ˆ„~„| }~different
- Page 182 and 183: Question 1: How is the value concep
- Page 184 and 185: exists, the value co-creation poten
- Page 186 and 187: partnering and cooperating are so o
- Page 188 and 189: process of analyzing the material s
- Page 192 and 193: Forsström, B., (1998). Trouble & S
- Page 194 and 195: Katz, M & Shapiro, C (1985). Networ
- Page 196 and 197: Shapiro, B.P., Rangan V.K., Moriart
- Page 198 and 199: Interviews:Interview: Buyer 1Interv
- Page 201: Relationships between buyers and se