12.07.2015 Views

Value Co-Creation in Industrial Buyer-Seller Partnerships ... - Doria

Value Co-Creation in Industrial Buyer-Seller Partnerships ... - Doria

Value Co-Creation in Industrial Buyer-Seller Partnerships ... - Doria

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

“ organizational arrangements that use resources and/or governance structures from morethan one exist<strong>in</strong>g organization” (p. 235).The rationale for hybrids is that they are a way to ga<strong>in</strong> advantages and get rid of thedisadvantages of conventional organizational forms by draw<strong>in</strong>g upon the capabilities ofseveral organizations. The advantages can be associated with resource dependencies,transaction cost considerations, access to capital, access to technologies, or new markets.The case companies for this study – ‘the <strong>Seller</strong>’ and ‘the <strong>Buyer</strong>’ – refer to their relationshipsas a partnership. Let us now turn to see what literature says about partnerships and thenmove forward to start explor<strong>in</strong>g the empirical case.4.6.1 The buyer-seller partnershipThe Borys and Jemison (1989) framework for analyz<strong>in</strong>g strategic alliances as “ hybridorganizational arrangements” offers <strong>in</strong>sight <strong>in</strong>to the management of <strong>in</strong>terdependencies, andconsequently different value creat<strong>in</strong>g processes. The case companies for the research, the<strong>Seller</strong> and the <strong>Buyer</strong>, declare that the relationship between the companies is a partnership,and therefore the partnership is here discussed as a form of cooperative relationshipstrategy.The buyer-seller partnership is one type of (strategic) alliance between twoorganizations. <strong>Co</strong>mpanies tend to enter <strong>in</strong>to high-<strong>in</strong>volvement relationships if it is perceivedthat there is someth<strong>in</strong>g to ga<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> work<strong>in</strong>g more closely together. A customer tak<strong>in</strong>g a high<strong>in</strong>volvementapproach to a relationship does not try to optimize the price <strong>in</strong> each s<strong>in</strong>gletransaction. Instead, it aims at improv<strong>in</strong>g its operations <strong>in</strong> the long term by us<strong>in</strong>g itssupplier’ s resources more effectively. In the same way a supplier that takes this approach,does not seek to maximize price and m<strong>in</strong>imize effort, but <strong>in</strong>stead work for improv<strong>in</strong>g bothits own and the customers’ bus<strong>in</strong>ess for the long term. This <strong>in</strong>volves attempts to reduce thetotal costs of the relationship by effective adaptations done by both companies as well as<strong>in</strong>novat<strong>in</strong>g and develop<strong>in</strong>g new solutions together. Worthwhile not<strong>in</strong>g is, however, thathigh-<strong>in</strong>volvement approaches to relationships always are resource demand<strong>in</strong>g (Ford, et al.2003).The assessment of possible benefits and sacrifices of <strong>in</strong>volvement <strong>in</strong> any relationshipcannot be made <strong>in</strong> advance. The assessment is made along the process of pursu<strong>in</strong>g arelationship through <strong>in</strong>teraction. A partnership is usually someth<strong>in</strong>g that is created through<strong>in</strong>teraction over time, build<strong>in</strong>g up trust and commitment between the <strong>in</strong>volved parties(Anderson & Narus 1990). In the IMP literature relationships are seen as a company’ s mostimportant assets, because without them it cannot ga<strong>in</strong> access to the resources of others,acquire the supplies that it needs, or solve its problems and thus generate revenue.81

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!