12.07.2015 Views

Value Co-Creation in Industrial Buyer-Seller Partnerships ... - Doria

Value Co-Creation in Industrial Buyer-Seller Partnerships ... - Doria

Value Co-Creation in Industrial Buyer-Seller Partnerships ... - Doria

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4.5.2 Summ<strong>in</strong>g up the conceptual discussion on co-creation of valueThe reason why parties cooperate is that they are dependent on each other’ s resources andthe resources can only by utilized through cooperation (Håkansson & Prenkert 2004).The assumption of resource heterogeneity 10 and possession of heterogeneous resources isone of the cornerstones of the argumentation on <strong>in</strong>teraction <strong>in</strong> the network view. Ascompanies possess heterogeneous resources it makes a difference with whom you <strong>in</strong>teractand how you <strong>in</strong>teract. Interact<strong>in</strong>g with the partner with the resources that are most valuableand do<strong>in</strong>g it <strong>in</strong> the most sensible way makes sense. No s<strong>in</strong>gle resource is of any value if youcannot make use of it. So, <strong>in</strong>teract<strong>in</strong>g with the partner right partner and be<strong>in</strong>g able to use thepartners´resources <strong>in</strong> a mean<strong>in</strong>gful way becomes key.The above reason<strong>in</strong>g leads to the follow<strong>in</strong>g conclusion: when two companies possessheterogeneous resources it makes sense to <strong>in</strong>teract <strong>in</strong> order to create someth<strong>in</strong>g together,provided that the companies can make use of each other’ s resources <strong>in</strong> a mean<strong>in</strong>gful way.The choice of value creat<strong>in</strong>g process for a specific relationship depends on the closure of theactivity system i.e. whether it is a buy<strong>in</strong>g/sell<strong>in</strong>g, produc<strong>in</strong>g/us<strong>in</strong>g, cooperative ornetwork<strong>in</strong>g activity system. Each activity system implies different logics for value creation.<strong>Value</strong> is created by exploit<strong>in</strong>g different types of <strong>in</strong>terdependencies <strong>in</strong> order to achieve eithera) efficiency <strong>in</strong> the exchange or b) a more effective use of each other’ s resources. Thefigure below illustrates the above reason<strong>in</strong>g. The positive trade off between benefits andsacrifices of <strong>in</strong>volvement is argued to be a prerequisite for value co-creation potential <strong>in</strong> thisstudy, someth<strong>in</strong>g that is also illustrated <strong>in</strong> the figure below.7810 Alderson (1957) orig<strong>in</strong>ally brought forth the notion of market<strong>in</strong>g br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g together heterogeneous supply andheterogeneous demand. Thereafter this idea has been a basic assumption <strong>in</strong> a number of studies with<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustrialmarket<strong>in</strong>g (Liljegren 1988, Hägg & Johanson (1982), Richardson (1972), Williamson (1973, 1975, 1980). Thediscussion on resource heterogeneity is one of theoretical build<strong>in</strong>g blocks of the IMP view on relationships andnetworks.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!