12.07.2015 Views

Value Co-Creation in Industrial Buyer-Seller Partnerships ... - Doria

Value Co-Creation in Industrial Buyer-Seller Partnerships ... - Doria

Value Co-Creation in Industrial Buyer-Seller Partnerships ... - Doria

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>in</strong>dustrial relationships the price can be seen as either a benefit or a sacrifice or both,depend<strong>in</strong>g on its accuracy and justifiability.3.4.3 <strong>Co</strong>nceptualiz<strong>in</strong>g priceThe classical economic def<strong>in</strong>ition of price is where the supply and demand curves meet andexchange takes place. In <strong>in</strong>dustrial market<strong>in</strong>g price is most often seen as a quantification ofvalue. What is common for most of the literature on price is that it is based on anassumption of arm’ s length relationships between buyer and seller. When look<strong>in</strong>g at high<strong>in</strong>volvementrelationships such as a partnership, the idea of value and pric<strong>in</strong>g pr<strong>in</strong>ciples aredifferent. The traditional cost-plus pr<strong>in</strong>ciple, which is the most common pric<strong>in</strong>g pr<strong>in</strong>ciplefor <strong>in</strong>dustrial goods, might not be the most relevant 6 (Noble & Gruca 1999). Accord<strong>in</strong>g toHåkansson and Gadde (2002) one obvious reason for a relationship is that it should result <strong>in</strong>cost reduction due to coord<strong>in</strong>ation. The argument is that value is synonymous with costreduction with<strong>in</strong> a dyadic relationship, when look<strong>in</strong>g at s<strong>in</strong>gle transactions. <strong>Co</strong>llaborationwith suppliers is a mechanism for cost reduction for the customer firm, which byimplication, impact upon pric<strong>in</strong>g. However, value <strong>in</strong> long-term buyer-seller relationshipscan be seen as more than a question of cost reduction (Ibid.).While research reports that cost-plus pric<strong>in</strong>g is the most commonly used pric<strong>in</strong>g logic,the argument often cited is that price should be based on value and demand. Accord<strong>in</strong>g toKortge and Okonkwo (1993) a supplier should assess the value of a product for thecustomer and charge a price that is based on customer perceived value. Shippley and Jobber(2001) present a six-stage process for strategic price sett<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>dustrial context, basedon cost, demand, and competitor prices. Ford et al. (1998) take a relational perspective topric<strong>in</strong>g and argue that price should reflect the <strong>in</strong>vestments and adaptations made by theactors <strong>in</strong> the relationship.Price as an aspect of cost and revenue <strong>in</strong> the exchange processGadde et al. (2002) discuss price as an empirical phenomenon. They conclude that “ price isonly one aspect of a complex pattern of primary and secondary cost and revenue patterns <strong>in</strong>the exchange process among buyers and sellers <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustrial markets” (p 16). This526 <strong>Co</strong>st-plus means a unit cost, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g direct and <strong>in</strong>direct costs, plus a percentage mark-up (Noble & Gruca1999)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!