–3–Early defence works and visitors, 1788–1802Bennelong Point became the site of the first defensive work commencedin the colony. In April 1788 Phillip appointed marine officer and parttimeastronomer, William Dawes, to act as artillery and engineer officer(Collins, I, 20) and he was requested to construct a small redoubt on theeast point. David Collins notes that, in July, Dawes’ labour force wasmade up of recently active thieves of whose guilt there was ‘littledoubt, though no positive proof’ (ibid, 28). The work was finished bythe end of the year and on new year’s day 1789 two guns were placedin position (Harvey, 2.0). The redoubt would have been just sufficientlyback from the northern tip of the point to attain a modest elevationand some command of the surrounding water.Before the work was completed Phillip was obliged to send HMSSupply on an urgent quest for flour and, in order to increase its capacity,he removed eight of its guns. These were landed on the west (Dawes’)point and a small breast work thrown up round them (Collins, I, 33). Bothbatteries fell into decay and the Bennelong Point battery was abandonedby 1791 (Harvey, 2.0). In December 1798, the ship’s company ofthe Supply under Lieutenant Kent completed a half-moon battery ‘onthe east point (fig.2), where stood the house built by Governor Phillipfor Bennillong’ (Collins, II, 97-98, 100). It was armed with some of the gunsfrom the Supply.In October 1800, Governor Philip Gidley King’s newly-appointed engineerofficer, Edward Abbott, reported that the ‘Bennelong Point or EastBattery… consists of 4 [6-pounder] guns and 6 embrasures formed ofwattle, casks, and earth, in a total state of decay’ (HRNSW, IV, 198). Noattempt was made to repair or reconstruct the work and instead thepoint was to become a de facto hospitality area for visiting survey andexpedition vessels.Nicholas Baudin’s French expedition spent five months in <strong>Sydney</strong> fromJune to November 1802 and it was on the tip of Bennelong Point,south of the battery site, that King permitted Baudin to establish hisshore tents ‘to facilitate the work of the astronomers’. Matthew Flinders’tents erected from the Investigator were already nearby (Bonnemains, 57;HRNSW, IV, 948). One of Baudin’s artists, Charles-Alexandre Lesueur, lefta fine collection of reasonably accurate pencil sketches of <strong>Sydney</strong> andBennelong Point (Bonnemains, 101–106). The Baudin visit was marked bythe nice balance of courtesy, hospitality and suspicion which subsistedbetween the English officials and the French visitors.If, as Collins suggests, Bennelong chose the site of his house, why wasit in such an exposed location on the tip of the point, overlooked byheadlands and ridges and visible from the waters of the harbour inthree directions? In the absence of records of the local people’s attitudeto the point, it seems likely that Bennelong chose to give maximumvisibility to the very solid evidence of the esteem in which he was heldby the European visitors. The value of such a highly visible symbol ofwhite benevolent intentions would not have escaped Phillip. Perhapshe guided Bennelong in his choice. Whatever the reason, the topographicalcharacteristics which made it attractive to Bennelong also
–4–made the vicinity useful for temporary defensive works and, when theywere derelict, as a shore camp for visiting foreign expeditions. On thepoint, the foreigners could be held at a not inconvenient arm’s lengthand at the same time be kept under easy surveillance.For the first quarter century of European settlement, then, practicalconsiderations arising from the topography determined the use of thenorthern part of the point. In the second decade of the nineteenthcentury, however, a new dimension was added to the way in whichthe place was perceived and Bennelong Point and its spinal ridgebecame the focus of a new official aesthetic.Bennelong Point and the Picturesque, 1810–1843The area now occupied by Bennelong Point, the gardens and MrsMacquarie’s Point was reserved for the crown by Phillip and was tocontinue as a government demesne free of leases or encroachments(Gilbert, 14–15). Under Hunter and King, however, a variety of leases andbuildings were permitted. When Governor William Bligh took over in1806 he would have none of such foolish or venal nonsense. Hecancelled the leases and required the removal of the buildings (HRNSW,VI, 305). It was yet another act that failed to endear him to his ‘mutinous’free subjects. Fortunately the next official governor, Lachlan Macquarie,reinforced and completed the clearance.Macquarie and his wife Elizabeth did a lot more than return thegovernment domain to its former shape: they also set out to embellishit. Elizabeth’s taste for the Picturesque is now well documented (Kerr &Broadbent, chapter 3) and in <strong>Sydney</strong> she had one of the grandest waterlandscapes in the world to work on. Moreover she had a husband whoshared her taste and was prepared to take responsibility for getting thework done.3. Billy Blue’s house, detail ofan engraving by S. Hallpublished in W.C. Wentworth’s… Description of … NSW, 1820.The first fruit of the partnership on Bennelong Point was modest: atwo-storey, vaguely castellated, octagonal cottage completed in 1812on the west side of Bennelong Point (figs 3 & 4). It was built onMacquarie’s orders as a dwelling for an eccentric black Jamaicanknown as Billy Blue. William Blue had been transported for stealingsugar and acted as a waterman, watchman and oyster seller. With histop hat and ‘naval’ uniform he was a highly visible member ofMacquarie’s marine menagerie (Ritchie, 165; Maclehose, 176–177).In 1814 Macquarie received a never-to-be-repeated gift on the convicttransport General Hewitt. It was the convicted forger, FrancisGreenway, an architect capable of the stylish realisation of theMacquaries’ dreams. Those dreams required castellated Gothic structuresas embellishments of harbour views and these Greenway provided—although not without complaint at the occasional interference of hisautocratic clients and the subversive activities of his military mastersand convict craftsmen. The latter recognised his talent but couldn’tstand his conceit.Greenway clothed the Dawes Point Battery with a masonry screen andadded a towered and castellated guard house, but his major defensive
- Page 7: (vi)
- Page 13 and 14: -6-5. Detail from a Charles Bayliss
- Page 15 and 16: -8-domain’ denies ‘facilities f
- Page 17 and 18: -10-In 1861 a five-gun (42-pounder?
- Page 19 and 20: 12. Site boundary for aproposed Nat
- Page 23 and 24: -16-held, as an article of faith, t
- Page 25 and 26: -18-form of the corridors were dete
- Page 27 and 28: -20-In addition to this generally a
- Page 29 and 30: -22-to be a multi-purpose hall. To
- Page 31 and 32: -24-1. exterior and external works;
- Page 33 and 34: -26-The second was the long-overdue
- Page 35 and 36: -28-Redesign of catering facilities
- Page 37 and 38: -30and approving proposals for wo
- Page 39 and 40: -32-ASSESSMENT OF SIGNIFICANCEThe g
- Page 41 and 42: -34-Schedule of levels of significa
- Page 43 and 44: -36-• folded beams throughout the
- Page 45 and 46: -38-• Coburn’s Curtain of the S
- Page 47 and 48: -40-Awards for excellenceThe follow
- Page 49 and 50: -42-The area covered by this conser
- Page 51 and 52: -44-inadequate for present use. Thi
- Page 53 and 54: -46-where a ‘higher standard of f
- Page 55 and 56: -48-32. Unacceptable ‘temporary
- Page 57 and 58: -50-above. However, any determinati
- Page 59 and 60: -52-• colour, texture, reflectivi
- Page 61 and 62:
-54-glass design and manufacture me
- Page 63 and 64:
-56-planters and limited transparen
- Page 65 and 66:
-58-Policy 18.3 of the 1993 conserv
- Page 67 and 68:
-60-seating, signs, drinking founta
- Page 69 and 70:
-62-Both approaches (via the exteri
- Page 71 and 72:
-64-the same angle as the existing
- Page 73 and 74:
-66-Policy 21.1 Any adaptation or d
- Page 75 and 76:
-68-Interior lighting policiesThe a
- Page 77 and 78:
-70-The seating in both Concert Hal
- Page 79 and 80:
-72-As it is now proposed to open t
- Page 81 and 82:
-74-SPACES ABOVE PODIUM LEVELSConce
- Page 83 and 84:
-76-scheme of the major hall (Utzon
- Page 85 and 86:
-78-Policy 31.1 The Reception Hall
- Page 87 and 88:
-80-Because of its height, volume,
- Page 89 and 90:
-82-60. Newly extended western foye
- Page 91 and 92:
-84-cost-effective, the least intru
- Page 93 and 94:
-86-relevant material (stone, ceram
- Page 95 and 96:
-88-and the early work was beset wi
- Page 97 and 98:
-90-Management and staff commitment
- Page 99 and 100:
-92-are now partly missing while ot
- Page 101 and 102:
-94-Policy 51.1 The more significan
- Page 103 and 104:
-96-The process should be given cer
- Page 105 and 106:
-98-• four eminent government and
- Page 107 and 108:
-100-• the actual periods in whic
- Page 109 and 110:
-104-Advertising, visual material,
- Page 111 and 112:
-106-James Semple KerrDr Jim Kerr h
- Page 113:
-102-Kerr, E.J., Designing a coloni